| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<e_OcnfgCVMGh9An7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:11:40 +0000 Subject: Re: RTD vs Biden Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho References: <v6r26v$30b06$1@dont-email.me> <v718ta$9ece$1@dont-email.me> <v71g2q$oli$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <qr-cnSEfiOYZ2An7nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com> <v71ns0$19q2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> From: % <pursent100@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 17:11:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <v71ns0$19q2$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240714-8, 2024-7-14), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Message-ID: <e_OcnfgCVMGh9An7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 75 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-DdTt5MnPOB4Kii/QPR0E402sMmV3xQv0PQk+uOhIG7QSwLjmeK5QGkCVkAYx5/+O90ADrImTtfSfMFF!i3KjK/2zAKyCx078R/OBQRzvMc9VKmFc8SL1rkXe2b/y/JQtLdne2qO8l1QHilZcpV8fj5tKJ+2w X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4573 The Doctor wrote: > In article <qr-cnSEfiOYZ2An7nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com>, > % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote: >> The Doctor wrote: >>> In article <v718ta$9ece$1@dont-email.me>, >>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: >>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: >>>>> In article <v70jsq$5ldd$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: >>>>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: >>>>>>> In article <xn0oob78bgz8k3z006@post.eweka.nl>, >>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With the first past the post system that they use in the UK, >>>>>>>> Britain is basically a two-party country government wise. When >>>>>>>> the British public get sick of Labour, the Conservatives will >>>>>>>> return to government... and vice-versa. I doubt I will ever see >>>>>>>> a [majority] Liberal Party UK government in my lifetime. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I never thought Liberals would go beyond 50 seats. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the UK ever uses our system of voting (PR) then that would be >>>>>>>> different... you'd have more hung parliaments and coalitions and >>>>>>>> then the LibDems would be more significant.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WEll the referendum on PR did say no PR. >>>>>> >>>>>> We never held a referendum on PR. We held a referendum on AV which >>>>>> basically results mostly in a “second past the post†victory in >>>> most of our >>>>>> constituencies. Proponents of PR are … not keen on AV. >> Imagine the last >>>>>> election on that basis - Reform voters STILL wouldn’t have >> gained more than >>>>>> a handful of seats but the Tories would gain a lot back when >> Reform’s >>>>>> second choices proved to be almost all pro Tory. AV still massively biases >>>>>> towards two parties in each seat. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AV? What is that? >>>> >>>> Alternative Vote, also known as Single Transferable Vote. You vote for >>>> candidates in numerical preference order. If no candidate gains 50% of the >>>> first preference votes, the second preferences of enough candidates that >>>> 50% is possible are taken and those candidates eliminated. The process >>>> repeats until a candidate gets more than 50% of the votes. >>>> >>>> So it’s not PR - it’s a way of maintaining constituency >> representation, by >>>> the least disliked candidate from the choices given. >>>> >>>> Just imagine what would have happened in many of the constituencies where >>>> the Conservatives came second and Reform came third. Then the ones where >>>> Reform came second and the Conservatives third. AV would have resulted in a >>>> very different parliament, but not a more representative one. >>>> >>> >>> The more regular term is preferential ballot. >>> >>> Canada came up with ranked ballot. >>> >>> They do it in Aus. >>> >>>> -- >>>> “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.†- The Doctor >>> >>> >> now i'm the president because i have both ears > > Chieftain I presime. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AIAKVst7jw