Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<e_ScnXNxu7u8Cm76nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 09:13:05 +0000 Subject: Re: Past Blast - "Wonder Woman 1984" - Corp Guy Using PET Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <3LScnf6o-ddHmXD6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <m55g9gF1fe1U1@mid.individual.net> <PrWcnfSsir_Q_3P6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <m5834aFe093U2@mid.individual.net> <vLqdnVb4yaZObXP6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <m58omiFguqjU3@mid.individual.net> <20250404075333.000000fc@gmail.com> <pa2dnTX2hoJwW236nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <m5c5f4F35tlU1@mid.individual.net> <gmmdnfQoUay9dW36nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <m5dgomF9mvkU2@mid.individual.net> <X0idnaa5DI6SXGz6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnvv3hr3.g7g.spamtrap42@one.localnet> <vsvvvc$36pju$8@dont-email.me> From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 05:13:06 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vsvvvc$36pju$8@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <e_ScnXNxu7u8Cm76nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com> Lines: 25 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-buStICDJtG97Siho0mzc9uXKPdt5x+UQ+gl+uS7QLIXO+6Uf2BDLLHGAf9qCkXC59I5oGQCM+oUcivZ!tPYpxWUOxUeBfRfJkAfBp6d4t5uJrtyVLWxCsS3O/dN9PP0ePx8tNahoP7oKAjDMqDD87b+aVf5N X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2711 On 4/7/25 3:47 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On 6 Apr 2025 00:14:27 GMT, Robert Riches wrote: > >> I don't have chapter and verse to quote, but back in the day I was told >> that the original design of the 6502 _WAS_ superior to the 6809, but >> Motorola sued on a basis of IP theft or similar, and the 6502 was dumbed >> down by removing registers and/or crippling the indexing modes. > > No, that would have been the Motorola 6800. The 6809 came somewhat later. > > The main rivalry in the 8-bit world was between the 6502 and the Z80. 6502 > fans liked to tout the fact that their fave CPU had so many instructions > that would execute in one clock cycle ... until you looked closer and > discovered that it was restricting itself to 8-bit address arithmetic, > where the Z80 was supporting full 16-bit addresses. > Well ... it was what it was. And the 65xx clearly WAS very very popular. How many Apple's, CBMs, sold ?