Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nyarlathotep1@hotmail.com (Norbert)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: "None Of Us Are Technically Good"
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 13:32:32 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <eaa3f32ea2187c7644adb1a3a704173b@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="249958"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="jHSG7cE2S9tCiwNMo3DGhaiamUtTAcQZosSD3d15Pig";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$fh6163juOq8kYSb0D/cDPOO1vfBXxZtbtkbaXOQAoER3jQ4ZOt5ty
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 6048208f8e4825d9cf9eefdf20568224fc305389
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1215
Lines: 6

John said this about his and his former (Beatles) bandmates
abilities on their instruments.  Is it true?

     I believe that Paul was generally technically good.  John, George
and Ringo all had technically good moments, though I'd say most of
John's good technique evaporated when his life became a "continuous acid
trip" (in Pete Shotton's words).