Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<eb4ecb6c3efc6009eeecee207067868b993aa64b@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions?
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 22:01:07 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <eb4ecb6c3efc6009eeecee207067868b993aa64b@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
 <3d1a8334-deee-45c6-ae03-340cd8551908@att.net> <vbafj7$3vd6q$1@dont-email.me>
 <69325e33-6b9a-4c2f-a0e3-25508d41b114@att.net>
 <rMATvapsf5bpmLmDOt3mDtI5bcA@jntp>
 <d7e0b83e-66ca-4d1f-a165-69c0dd47718e@att.net> <vberjd$qdqn$1@dont-email.me>
 <7dfa422db40391861bfc6803c4c1bb4561d1f8b6@i2pn2.org>
 <vbfpci$utdu$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 02:01:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1049104"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vbfpci$utdu$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1941
Lines: 19

On 9/6/24 4:40 PM, WM wrote:
> On 06.09.2024 14:38, joes wrote:
>> Am Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:12:29 +0200 schrieb WM:
> 
>>>> 0 < ... < ⅟⌊4+⅟x⌋ < ⅟⌊3+⅟x⌋ < ⅟⌊2+⅟x⌋ < ⅟⌊1+⅟x⌋ < x
>>> 0 is smaller than all that. Therefore there is no increase at 0.
>>> x is larger than all that. Therefore your x is not the least one
>>> posiible.
>> Therefore no x can be the least unit fraction.
> 
> No definable x. No epsilon.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

Which means no "Unit Fraction" as the reciprical of a Natural Number, 
since they are all definable.

Thus, your NUF must also be counting some sub-finite values, or it just 
doesn't exist.