Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 05:05:31 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <ebea9c2f2a47a9616d0516efc2911cb3@www.novabbs.com>
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <1819b79e1aa58c97$89507$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9e55d347a16ad439d5b2e75440ae1a6d@www.novabbs.com> <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com> <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <vm3ncs$20493$1@dont-email.me> <7db98cab57f6050f8daf2f88b9bfdcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vm6lel$2jd9o$1@dont-email.me> <181aad880796ed2c$86763$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <FPWgcmBqx8knYkPFdVPJ444jTTI@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3665614"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$wWUqNS.p/XaOEBMcP5S62en.T/MgBfOm3oxSqBx2TqG4FgKSCRbFO
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2784
Lines: 30

On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 22:10:28 +0000, Python wrote:

> Le 14/01/2025 à 22:50, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 22:39, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>>
>>>
>>> It is a fact that experiments have shown that GR correctly
>>> predicts how light is gravitational deflected.
>>
>> A lie, of course - according to [GR],
>> light [in vacuum] doesn't deflect
>> and take always straight/geodesic paths.
>
> How could you know anything about what GR says or doesn't say as you
> admit
> to stay as far as physics as possible in order to not become a
> "brainwashed fanatic" :-)
>
> (for the record: a straight/geodesic path in space-time does not
> necessarily corresponds to a straight path in space. Maciej is sooo
> highly
> confused on everything, especially geometry. It is quite delusional to
> think that GR pretends so given that planets orbits [in space] are
> clearly
> not straight lines even if they correspond to geodesics in space-time).
He asserts that the non-Euclidean is real and the Euclidean is not real
by calling the Euclidean a "projection" of the non-Euclidean. Thus, he
says the Euclidean involves a "distortion." The non-Euclidean
reification fallacy is the distortion. Thank you for refuting the
relativist's defense of using the Huygens principle to keep the speed of
light constant.