Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: old power, Short Vectors Versus Long Vectors
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 21:19:32 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <ebed4559bf2176f10d7a88208e4df03f@www.novabbs.org>
References: <v06vdb$17r2v$1@dont-email.me> <v0rbck$2jor1$1@dont-email.me> <v0rhce$1itj$1@gal.iecc.com> <v0rk4c$2lnd6$4@dont-email.me> <v0s5gd$1mk0$1@gal.iecc.com> <v10mdk$krs$1@dont-email.me> <df75c399d37898bab65453d6f3871209@www.novabbs.org> <v11mme$b3hb$1@dont-email.me> <v13l16$onc3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="95192"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$9XYui/CqMjtsnzM9efOsOemA2g1Ot6aR1QRcnNyhy0u1DJCkfOCzK
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8
Bytes: 2656
Lines: 41

BGB wrote:

> On 5/2/2024 10:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 May 2024 20:14:09 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
>> 
>>> If you don't know what you are looking for, how do you know when you
>>> find it ?!!!
>> 
>> Maybe the procedure for determining that you’ve found it is recursively
>> enumerable, but that for doing the search is not? ;)

> I think it is a case of determining if someone responds in favorable 
> ways to interactions, does not respond in unfavorable ways, and does not

> present any obvious "deal breakers".

> Presumably other people are doing something similar, but with different 
> metrics.

Different definitions !!

> Though, granted, the whole process tends to be horribly inefficient.

If you are anything like a normal male, you are compatible with about
1% of women of your age group. Likewise, 1% of any given women in your
age group will be compatible with you ±.

So, you (and her) will have to pass over 10,000 of the others to end
up with a compatible partner. 

> There generally doesn't exist any good way to determine who exists in a 
> given area, or to get a general idea for who may or may not be worth the

> time/effort of interacting with them.

Women, by and large, do the picking:: mem, by and large, do the
acquiescing.

> Many dating sites (and people on them) seem to operate under the 
> assumption of "will post pictures, good enough".

Dating sites are for losers. P E R I O D