Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 08:28:17 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <ed9875b2440f5817007f7dd003ae9aed@www.novabbs.org>
References: <0dd990630edbc9332716605722eb087a@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2368052"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$dJbSz8UIwYx9VnVYGkC6.ehQGvxcU0H8UFIiGWkA5cKZcrThM/jGO
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45
Bytes: 6790
Lines: 130

On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 0:50:18 +0000, rhertz wrote:

> In 1930 Wolfgang Pauli  proposed the existence of the neutrino (named in
> 1933 by Fermi) to solve the violation of energy conservation in beta
> decay (when a neutron turns into a proton and emits an electron).
> Scientists observed that the emitted electrons had varying energies,
> rather than a fixed value as expected. The neutrino was ALLEGEDLY
> detected experimentally by Cowan and Reines in 1956.
>
> The missing energy varied from 0.1 to 0.2 eV (millions of times lower
> than electrons at rest). Pauli assumed that neutrinos might be massless,
> like photons, and this kept in the '70s, with the Standard Model
> (1970s). Analysis from Solar Neutrinos (1960s–2001) suggested that
> neutrinos oscillate, wich (de Broglie) require mass.
>
> Up to date, the neutinos mass is UNKNOWN. As neutrinos proved to be the
> JOKER CARD of particle physics, different types of neutrino emerged
> since its invention TO JUSTIFY the conservation of energy. All three of
> them were asigned a spin of 1/2 in the Standard Model, only for
> equations involving SMEP charged particles. They are; Electron neutrino
> (< 2.2 eV), Muon neutrino (< 0.17 eV) and Tau neutrino (< 15.5 MeV). The
> energies ARE STILL NOT KNOWN (so their mass, IF THEY HAVE IT AT ALL).
>
> Two collosal experiments have been developed to capture neutrinos, at
> the expense of tens of billions of USD. One of these collosus is the
> Japanese Super-Kamiokande (see attached pic), which uses ultrapure
> water. The other one is the IceCube arrangement, located inside the
> Antarctic ice. IceCube was designed to CAPTURE ultra-high-energy cosmic
> neutrinos, while the Super-K is designed to CAPTURE solar, atmospheric,
> and accelerator neutrinos, which are much less energetic.
>
> The concept behind the CAPTURE of neutrinos is strictly based on the
> emission of Cherenkov radiation (blue light flash), when they penetrate
> water or ice, because its speed would be faster than light in those
> enviroments, so they have to subside energy (Cerenkov discovered this
> 100 years ago).
>
> The PROBLEM with neutrinos is that they don't like to interact with
> matter. ALLEGEDLY (if neutrinos really exist), the probability to detect
> ONE NEUTRINO PER YEAR, at the Japanese Super-K is:
>
> ONE IN 10,000,000,000,000,000
>
> Or about 5,000 to 10,000 neutrinos "detected by the Cherenkov blue flash
> over 10^20 neutrinos per year entering into the Super-Kamiokande
> (Super-K). It means about 10 to 20 neutrinos per day.
>
> How the neutrinos "ARE DETECTED"?: Super-K uses a cylindrical stainless
> steel tank, 41.4 meters tall × 39.3 meters in diameter (like a 13-story
> building buried underground). It contains the inner  Super-K
> (36-meter-tall × 34-meter-diameter) is filled with 50,000-ton ultrapure
> water.
>
> Super-K uses 11,129 photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) to capture the
> Cherenkov blue flashes that form a cone of light as it decreases its
> speed at about 0.7c. The PMTs are extremely fragile and are placed side
> by side in all the internal surface. If one explodes, a chain reaction
> happens that destroy most of the other PMT.
>
> The PMT MUST BE SUPERSENSITIVE because they only can capture few photons
> of the light cone, as the neutrinos penetrates into the Super-K volume.
> The FLASH can happen at any depth, because neutrinos have to interact
> with binding energies in the nucleus of atoms to be detected. PMTs have
> few nanoseconds to detect the arrival times of photons. A solar neutrino
> (from the Sun) interacts in the water, creating an electron, which is
> the one that emits Cherenkov light, hitting about 100 PMTs. The output
> of the PMTs raise the energy close to 5 MeV, after which software
> processing complete the calculations.
>
> One additional narrative is the existence of antineutrinos, which are
> (allegedly) distinguished in the Super-K.
>
> The most important facts are:
>
> *  Neutrinos must have mass, but IT IS NOT KNOWN YET.
>
> * Only a difference in alleged masses of the three types of neutrinos is
> known, BUT ONLY BECAUSE the detected oscillations are different.
>
> * Since they are emitted (i.e. by the Sun), neutrinos change (mutate)
> from one type to the other (or scientists allege to).
>
> * The mutations are originated (as they say) due to mechanisms:
>
> **** Seesaw Mechanism: Heavy right-handed neutrinos suppress left-handed
> neutrino masses.
>
> *** Dirac vs. Majorana: If neutrinos are their own antiparticles
> (Majorana), their mass could arise from exotic processes.
>
> MY CONCLUSION: Physics needs that neutrinos REALLY EXIST, otherwise the
> law of conservation of energy is violated.

good good good good good good good good

the law of conservation of energy is bollocks.

Energy is eternally created and destroyed in our infinite universe.

Follow Arindam's physics!

e=created/destroyed energy kinetically = 0.5mVVN(N-k)
That explains all energy formations and destructions from lighting a
match to atom bombs.

Woof woof woof woof

Bertietaylor

 





 How neutrinos are generated
> IS UNKNOWN. If neutrinos have mass or not IS UNKNOWN. Tens of billions
> of USD wasted for nothing, as the confusion in physics increase with
> each generation of geniuses proposing contradictory ideas. The existence
> of cosmic neutrinos is essential in astrophysics to FILL THE VOID in
> calculations. Also, in cosmology, their role is essential for such
> unproven theories like the BB.
>
> I smell a rotten fish around this.
>
> Meanwhile, physicists making six figures plus expenses are more than
> happy, and have zero accountability.
>
> HOAX!

--