Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:18:49 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <edeec81c12f4940451fed59eab06086f@www.novabbs.com>
References: <1805cd581e3df873$381521$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <554bd957ea65660a8e6415ca6a48c08c@www.novabbs.com> <1805e9d0d77d73d1$381534$977218$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1536774"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$BroAvipGDsvpPxBV5I5eUeh7IYP05XvwIpx/4xdR6yAxCPziLpgdC
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35
Bytes: 3174
Lines: 60

On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 6:18:35 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 08.11.2024 o 00:57, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:36:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> > > As seen, the definition of second loved so
> > > much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> > > wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> > > lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> > > 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> > >
> > >
> > > Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
> > > solar system is measuring the length
> > > of solar day. What is the result predicted
> > > by the Einsteinian physics?
> > > One prediction is - 99766. From the
> > > postulates. The second prediction is -
> > > 86400. From definition.
> > > And similiarly with the prediction of
> > > a measurement of a meridian.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for your attention, poor
> > > relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.
> >
> > Cutting and pasting this nonsense indicates
> > some kind of obsession, perhaps OCD.
>
> Raving, spitting and slandering won't help
> anything,

That's right, neither will obsessively reposting
it.  So why does Wozniak keep raving, spitting,
"slandering" and reposting this refuted nonsense?

> the mumble of your idiot guru

Wozniak is the only one "slandering" here, as he
spits and raves and snarls his insults.

> remains not even consistent.

Wozniak is completely unaware that his argument
is ... inconsistent.  He even deleted a cogent
rebuttal rather than refute it because it's
irrefutable.

If the postulates that derive the Lorentz transform
equations are correct in a domain of applicability,
then the LTEs are correct in that domain.  If the
LTEs are correct, then their conclusions are also
correct, like the relativity of simultaneity, and no
duplicitous jibber jabber can refute it.  Wozniak
fails Logic 101.

the skills he needs to produce a right answer are
exactly the skills he doesn't have to recognize
what a right answer is. (D-K effect).