Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:35:26 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <ee9a889a8143efb488bfc9018dc0c52c449bfe78@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
	<45ad1007-b1a7-49d0-a650-048f02738226@att.net>
	<ZrUpfgO3RQL0qsj_ugH_ng035iM@jntp>
	<e51a19c8-9f22-43ec-a382-b93019b4ce1d@att.net>
	<Aj67svgBqlC6ubyAZ01SM3EN5mc@jntp>
	<9ef8dd8a-69be-44e2-bcf6-ea9c1fb30e21@att.net>
	<LHtSphVaxvF9i9lsFtvEfbB4PS8@jntp>
	<92189533-0c1f-4532-816f-564651cc8bf7@att.net>
	<zzRMVwrDvZCAHeIta8vMnBBxp8E@jntp>
	<155cdc8a628d47be1632791227bccf99425b1d5e@i2pn2.org>
	<en_fjxuLKegQPxOwdC8lXsKVbbI@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:35:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3438386"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2231
Lines: 19

Am Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:32:44 +0000 schrieb WM:
> Le 17/08/2024 à 16:29, Richard Damon a écrit :
>> On 8/17/24 9:28 AM, WM wrote:
>>> Le 16/08/2024 à 19:39, Jim Burns a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> no element of ℕᵈᵉᶠ is its upper.end, because for each diminishable k
>>>> diminishable k+1 disproves by counter.example that k is the upper.end
>>>> of ℕᵈᵉᶠ
>>> SBZ(x) starts with 0 at 0 and increases, but at no point x it
>>> increases by more than 1 because of ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0.
>>> Therefore there is a smallest unit fractions and vice versa a greatest
>>> natnumber. What can't you understand?
>> But there is no point (>0) where it has a finite value,
> You can't see it and you are unable to derive it from mathematics. But
> blindness is not an argument.
Neither is darkness.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.