Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 11:24:55 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <eefb001eea71c7b0a54fdfe7e7fd3bd715b1d1d5@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vp5t55$2gt2s$1@dont-email.me>
	<vp6pmb$2opvi$1@dont-email.me> <vp8700$30tdq$1@dont-email.me>
	<vp9ct8$3af6t$1@dont-email.me> <vpav34$3jct4$1@dont-email.me>
	<vpc3u9$3skb7$1@dont-email.me> <vpcsvk$irt$2@dont-email.me>
	<vpev2e$fgop$1@dont-email.me> <vpfmpp$j7qb$6@dont-email.me>
	<vphbnb$10gus$1@dont-email.me> <vpivp4$1fvqe$6@dont-email.me>
	<vpklrk$21jn9$1@dont-email.me> <vplbnp$25vp2$5@dont-email.me>
	<b122ed1dc2c636321627d4dfc7936e463f920690@i2pn2.org>
	<vpltcn$28j3a$6@dont-email.me>
	<a8b150912bc326cd01c9e9ee89762d12b9fc571e@i2pn2.org>
	<vpm6hq$2dvrs$4@dont-email.me> <vpmo1m$2g3p0$3@dont-email.me>
	<vpn9m5$2jkdj$5@dont-email.me>
	<a686628c3dd1a48f5dcb8288e69758325782daa6@i2pn2.org>
	<vpoqbj$2vaf3$4@dont-email.me> <vppbmb$323f6$2@dont-email.me>
	<vpqd41$37v45$2@dont-email.me>
	<032b4871d813d3a0ff4dc7dcbf50cb6f2f26550b@i2pn2.org>
	<vpquj2$3b32c$1@dont-email.me>
	<651312e43b4fd7dddd5863eb05ec36e33b730124@i2pn2.org>
	<vptln2$3st19$10@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 11:24:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2326961"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3973
Lines: 43

Am Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:51:46 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 2/28/2025 2:46 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:04:48 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the
>>>>>>>>>>> emulation being incorrect or you would have provided the
>>>>>>>>>>> correct emulation sequence long ago.
>>>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?
>>>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th
>>>>>>>>>> instruction,
>>>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,
>>>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation.
>>>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.
>>>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is.
>>>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question:
>>>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH?
>>>> Look at what HHH1 does.
>> 
>>>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH,
>>> Is stupidly wrong.
>> You only asked for the trace of DD.
> Within the context of the title of this thread knucklehead.
Huh? Makes no sense.

>>>> because it doesn't call DD in turn,
>>>> we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we either
>>>> enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions)
>>>> or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the
>>>> return value of HHH.
There are your lines of DD.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.