Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Message to Bertie.
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 08:46:11 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <ef01bfb59e3564cafb5e175829c3329a@www.novabbs.com>
References: <vftqp8$3soar$1@dont-email.me> <0c4d8c889ab0ece84848441990baaf28@www.novabbs.com> <vgb6nu$3tk2c$2@dont-email.me> <51ff394f20f15e35a141e3a9504bedd1@www.novabbs.com> <vgbm8t$3tk2d$1@dont-email.me> <904f281e60a6d908261ec10561c38679@www.novabbs.com> <vgpn77$3t9bh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1793886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$iynznGMrx67hEAHFOTUY1O.mlAPaW/zME2eyXg53qoeGyVrchXS7e
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
Bytes: 4711
Lines: 89

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 7:26:30 +0000, David Canzi wrote:

> On 11/4/24 20:03, Bertietaylor wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:29 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/4/24 15:19, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with
>>>>>>> you are
>>>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
>>>>>> denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and
>>>>>> denunciations
>>>>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
>>>>>> wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
>>>>>> abuse of mathematics.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
>>>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it.  Your
>>>>> efforts
>>>>> here are futile.
>>>>
>>>> Those who reject Arindam's physics as it does not suit them are not
>>>> scientists. They do not want new truths that overturn their dogmas. As
>>>> Tesla said, they are clever theologians.
>>>
>>> Nothing you say about them here has any effect on them.  What effect
>>> are you hoping your words will have?  How long have you been wasting
>>> your life on this solo crusade without visibly accomplishing anything?
>>
>> Who said Arindam has not accomplished anything? Only liars and frauds
>> posing as physicists. Arindam has exposed them as liars and frauds with
>> his inertia violation experiments single handed lly and that is some
>> accomplishment.
>
> There were once physicists here but I don't think there are any
> here any more.

There could be thousands of lurkers.

What you have here are people with a casual
> interest in physics.  We are not the type of people you need
> to reach.

Arindam publishes his original physics works online for personal
satisfaction, copyright, and future reference. He considers doing that
his sacred duty for the good of all. What people here and elsewhere now
think about his physics is their business.

You need to get the attention of a published
> professional scientist.

Arindam has met a few of them. Their reaction is negative. The usual
response is that their field of work is different. They will let Arindam
know later. Well, tomorrow hasn't come yet.

In Australia and India the minds are second rate and colonised. Thus
dead to new ideas when locally originated. Import from US works for all
new stuff so if Americans take notice there may be scope. But they are
run by Jews and Protestants for whom relativity is the highest religion
with Einstein as God. So no chance there.

Meaning Arindam has to depend upon his on his own resources.




You have not managed to do this,
> and nobody here you might somehow convince of your anti-Einstein
> and anti-Newton odeas would be able to do that for you either.

We depend upon the Gods and Goddesses for Their kind guidance. Que sera
sera.
>
> You're lecturing to the wrong audience.

We are not lecturing, we are propagandising to all who may care to
follow the online links to Arindam's new physics that have often been
posted in sci.physics.
>
>>> Cut your losses.