Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,uk.telecom.mobile,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 01:39:10 +0100
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <eill6lxe74.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <8u8k6lx5s2.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vn8tl2$18bsa$1@dont-email.me>
 <vn8ubp$18iiv$1@dont-email.me> <vn8vej$18nk5$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net IA5fypSFnG5Hs4P452ny/QHKloVRSM/+bTElChLyP8273YSGye
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g+EtefV5fXm/k35PePmwCx7a5zM= sha256:bsVsPizgcti0keZssGp74VxpMZYoY26tKwvVDQ/EOdk=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To: <vn8vej$18nk5$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1827

On 2025-01-27 22:56, Alan wrote:
> On 2025-01-27 13:38, Peter wrote:
>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Huh, no. It would be a standard if many manufacturers followed it. 
>>>> None did.
>>>
>>> It still has a set of "standards", in the sense of the rules Apple
>>> defined as to what it can and cannot do, how it should be made, etc.
>>
>> What non-Apple device charged by Apple's proprietary Lightning cable?
> 
> Wrong question?
> 
> What third party products conformed to Apple's specs for Lightning?
> 
> The answer is: "Many, many, many".

Only those designed to work with Apple hardware, not generic hardware.

Me, I have only once seen one such device, a pair of earphone buds that 
my bank used as a gift.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.