| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<ej7k3kddr7f84a682dc63ddm7aqbbu2dhk@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Food Prices Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 15:08:47 -0700 Lines: 110 Message-ID: <ej7k3kddr7f84a682dc63ddm7aqbbu2dhk@4ax.com> References: <9MKYP.163084$0DKa.113787@fx14.iad> <fl273kpf246dhmoujb36pvoirke9vomb3p@4ax.com> <Ws1ZP.243920$hqs3.55400@fx11.iad> <rb993k97qh8a2ktr9oev9ltljql73nm8hk@4ax.com> <1012ba8$24gfr$1@dont-email.me> <8iu93k91n3k4t6r5grinodq7itl12sqtbd@4ax.com> <krKZP.374680$vvyf.200607@fx18.iad> <94ef3klt885463tnmd10vol2p7kq0t3m5d@4ax.com> <388_P.517727$qmJf.384646@fx16.iad> <9s3i3kpa35sms6shmnmk72riietr58t90c@4ax.com> <P%j_P.443$%pKb.373@fx14.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net FTWqfl5fsEKqix4S/p2j+ANLV19mBIGHiaqyo7XENGUb75cR2D Cancel-Lock: sha1:OV/ZvmMntqp1Zby1B+WVQ49zhXA= sha256:szMewmlqA3LqTyh/lrTvdo1Sz1/Sv6v5v6ppIGq6TeI= User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 On Fri, 30 May 2025 15:19:11 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Thu May 29 19:19:22 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote: >> On Fri, 30 May 2025 01:48:47 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >> >Even in the new world colonies they had 10,000 british troops stationed >> >> 50,000 is more closer to the mark than 10,000. >> >> "The British Army and the War of Independence" >> <https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34530/chapter-abstract/292941888> >> "At its peak, the British army in North America had approximately >> 50,000 officers and men, constituting the largest expeditionary force >> sent overseas by any British governments." >> >> However, there's a problem. All 50,000 were not British. Here's a >> source that claims 30,000 were Hessians and 25,000 were Americans >> fighting in "provincial" regiments. >> "The British Army in the American Revolution" >> <https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/british-army-american-revolution> >> Since the total is over 50,000, all the numbers are likely to be >> exaggerated. >> >> >hey were forcing the colonists to house and feed these troops. People that talk about history as if they understand it when they read a kindergarten book about it should learn actual facts. >> >> Facts? Where did you get your numbers? Or did you just invent them >> of the occasion. >> >> >When I said that I read out 3 libraries of all of their non-fiction did you think that books written about the revolution written in 1850 weren't closer to the facts? Perhaps you should stick with the CNN version. >> >> What book about the American Revolution was written in 1850 that was >> "closer to the facts"? I'm curious. >> >> You have a faulty memory. Your original claim did not include the >> "non-fiction" clause, which you added fairly recently. This is your >> earliest mention of libraries that I could find: >> >> 06/07/2022 >> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/QNPNSofg064/m/Xaamy15iBQAJ> >> "I would warrant that I've read more than 20 times more books than you >> have. I read out three public libraries, the military library and all >> of the books I used to gain the knowledge to become an engineer." > > > > >Liebermann and his magic Google picks a site that doesn't mention the real problem - that British soldiers were expexted to be fed and housed by American families. There isn't anything that the failure cannot argue about. The real problem is that Tom rarely addresses the topic at hand. Instead, he either changes the topic to something with which he is allegedly familiar or invents amazing facts and figures to fill in the blanks in his faultless memory. I was addressing the problem that you (Tom) claimed that there were only 10,000 British troops in its original colonies, instead of the approximately 50,000 troops that various sources mention. >After SAYING that the Covid-19 vaccine did him no harm "First do no harm" (Hippocrates). The doctors and big pharma did their jobs. No harm was done. >and we now know that 74% of people taking the vaccine suffered permanent heart damage Show me a reputable source that makes that claim and I might begin to believe you. As it stands, you pretend to be an authority on everything, which is inconsistent with the manure that you're spreading. >it really sounds good him telling us that he didn't get the vaccine because I said not to. Huh? I mentioned getting Pfizer vaccinated every time I was vaccinated or every time you repetitiously asked for exactly the same information. Want me to email a copy suitable for framing? 04/03/2021 05/01/2021 12/03/2021 04/06/2022 10/05/2022 11/18/2023 09/16/2024 >So why did he say at the time that he was getting it because I warned people not toL? I never said that. Were you keeping score? Did anyone follow your warning and heed your advice? >Now pinhead is talking about the British Army as if they weren't the British Army because a percentage of them were Hessians (Germans). Nice of you to mention what I was talking about. Too bad it's wrong (and contrived) as usual. Keep trying. >The little boy was broght up as a freak and he never found it better to act sane. Your traditional belittling comment was suppose to be at the beginning of your message, not the end. This might help you recognize the difference: <https://www.google.com/search?q=head%20up%20ass&udm=2> Short walk/hike today. Everyone had something important to do after the walk. <https://www.strava.com/activities/14642975955> Watching 7 goslings mow the lawn was fun. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272 Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558