Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<er6ucj1ed5qv1nhmh48kjeg9rqcvoiuod6@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mad Hamish <newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: OT Politics Re: Three Body Problem Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 22:44:11 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <er6ucj1ed5qv1nhmh48kjeg9rqcvoiuod6@4ax.com> References: <ee1c97625081058543bc892d2bdcc245@www.novabbs.com> <d22fa5d6-5f03-bdf3-90c7-fd89e03bf440@example.net> <va0c7p$30u2h$1@dont-email.me> <lge9cjhe5g68iokifshc92qd9h6rh6emml@4ax.com> <va2udf$3gr1g$1@dont-email.me> <gvbgcj1uo1mlmalmvtern68ubsu4ngal8p@4ax.com> <va9g12$r3a0$1@dont-email.me> <q0chcjdsgao14sb3joh95kcv9u0qb6o9if@4ax.com> <vadcph$1fq7s$1@dont-email.me> <vadkfh$1hvr7$1@epsilon3.eternal-september.org> <lijmcjpri12qri0tegvll87j7aqri3r4vu@4ax.com> Reply-To: newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:44:16 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5f4c8d61eb7edd45b0dddc59cee2cb04"; logging-data="3663083"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fDlzpw3LH9PtMhzDm4RiI" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218 Cancel-Lock: sha1:RUbmzTpXPviqxTwwKpq54/hJCdw= Bytes: 2440 On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 08:33:13 -0700, Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote: >On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 16:48:32 -0500, "Jay E. Morris" ><morrisj@epsilon3.comcon> wrote: > >>On 8/24/2024 2:37 PM, BCFD 36 wrote: >>>> IOW, if it were the popular vote that counted, 2016 would have seen a >>>> runoff election [1] exactly two choices: Hillary and Trump. The >>>> expectation being that one or the other would get more that 50% of the >>>> votes. >>> >>> Only if that is how the election laws were written. I think it would be >>> wildly impractical to hold multiple national elections. >>> >> >>Which is why some are advocating for a ranked voting system. > >Which the citizens of Alaska, IIRC, will shortly be voting on ... >prohibiting, having had actual experience with it. > >It must be pretty stinky to get enough people to sign an initiative to >prohibit it. Australia uses preferential voting for all state and federal elections It works pretty reasonably