| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<eu9ddjp2df3al0j0ghr68bhs0glloctvpu@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: New SETI search Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 23:11:49 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 84 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <eu9ddjp2df3al0j0ghr68bhs0glloctvpu@4ax.com> References: <vaj062$2kr3d$1@dont-email.me> <menqcj1270ta8rjtmasodqi5nkier8rnhl@4ax.com> <vb5odm$31ra3$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="3226"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:M1e74vcJ01nTbN8CtfZbAf/DE2A= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 03C0922986F; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 02:11:48 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3CE22978C for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 02:11:45 -0400 (EDT) id 6302C5DC29; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 06:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 410145DC26 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 06:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1585A5F863 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 06:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/1585A5F863; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=buzz.off id B4BE1DC01A9; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:11:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 08:11:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX199Z0ab8VCS3DxC24wF9WPHbq0coDmzL9SR/1U35AKPrGbQnTzwgP5/ HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 5943 On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 18:22:56 -0700, the following appeared in talk.origins, posted by Mark Isaak <specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net>: >On 8/26/24 10:24 PM, El Kabong wrote: >> RonO wrote: >> >>> A group is using the Murchison wide field array to monitor for super >>> civilizations in other galaxies. The civilizations would have to be >>> super advanced in order to generate the 100 MHz signal that they are >>> scanning for. Huge amounts of energy would have to be channeled into >>> transmission of such signals. Would we ever expend such an effort to >>> tell someone in another galaxy that we exist? 100 MHz is in the middle >>> of the FM radio band, but in our expanding universe what would have been >>> the frequency transmitted by any one of the 2,800 galaxies scanned in >>> the survey? >>> >>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/08/240826131354.htm >>> >>> Ron Okimoto >> >> Previous searches at Aricebo and other sites looked for >> alien signals at 1420 Mhz. They picked that frequency >> because it is a hydrogen line. The thinking is that >> aliens would more likely broadcast there than an >> arbitrary frequency. It never made sense to me because >> the signal will be attenuated by any hydrogen lying in >> the path, and because if you tune in to the hydrogen >> line, you'll find... hydrogen noise! >> >> Maybe space aliens will broadcast on 100 Mhz because it's >> a nice round number? Then again they might have 3 digits >> per hand and use a base-6 system and think 60.466176 Mhz >> is a nice round number where other hexadigits would >> listen. In any case you have to pick a frequency >> somewhere. >> >> The article you cited does link to an article on a >> previous survey done in 2020, but it doesn't mention the >> frequency. >> >> If the aliens transmit from a large phased array like >> MWA, they could transmit a large effective power within >> the beamwidth, without actually transmitting huge power. >> But the beam has to be aimed in our direction. Maybe >> they send signals periodically in every direction. >> Similarly the MWA has to have its array pointed in the >> right direction at the right time. >> >> The chances are slim, but worth trying. > >If I had vast technological resources and wanted to send an "I'm here" >signal to unknown aliens over potentially vast distances, I wouldn't >generate light. That would take way too much energy, especially if it >was broadcast widely. Instead, I would rig up some opaque sheets and set >them orbiting around a star, with gaps in places so that anyone watching >from the plane of orbit would see a dit-dah message spelled out >repeating every 6 (of our) months or so. It would work only on a fairly >narrow plane, but at least it's better than a laser pointed at a single >target. > Interesting idea. > >Is SETI set up to look for anything like that? > Not that I've ever heard. > >Of course, I would never do anything to attract strangers until I was >more than confidence that my technology could overpower any hostile >aliens I might attract. If possible, I would set up the signal several >hundred light-years away from concentrations of my species' population. > I concur; the "bird in the pile of crap" joke is exemplary. Pollyannas tend to have short lifespans. > -- Bob C. "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'" - Isaac Asimov