Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<exidnRBwBvPQO4X1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 11:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: The proof of Noether theorem
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <183c8f1d7e4023e0$3256502$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 04:51:28 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <183c8f1d7e4023e0$3256502$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <exidnRBwBvPQO4X1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-g4cR4RHUa7x2MlMCFbB7aBgKxaYPInMQoflXGQ2Xm1VyEJjzFxZXGEsxFYASZTKJ+juU8YIwmyiPOk1!VgwbNiH15gmtDGemVztbIao+576QH2NYFIyYzxDlBGoLZcq1Pgs5axBgVZma2VOTLyZE+yDpwjA=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2129

On 05/04/2025 11:55 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> Well, Pythagorean theorem had about
> 120 proofs - and is still [allegedly]
> not valid  for the world we inhabit.
>
> So, how about Noether theorem? Proven
> or not, the question whether it is valid
> should still be open I guess?

It's really simple and follows from Pauli principle.

I.e., that one thing cannot be in two different places.

So, it's often represented as that two quantities
have the same sum, "conservation", simply as of
after about a symmetry, "same difference" on both
sides, any what's an "invariant".

The, "continuity" law is often written rather
simply, "equals zero", so of course the "conservation"
and "continuity" laws are inextricable.

Then, "continuity" law can also be written as
"conservation" law, and vice versa.

Then, a usual idea in extended bodies is that
it's more properly, "continuity law".