Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers
 are wrong
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 14:55:29 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <f0be934f2a26969e435b81050738f0960d4eb366@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq1qnr$q7t4$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 14:55:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2480367"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1456
Lines: 11

Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 08:42:03 -0600 schrieb olcott:

> I challenged everyone here to provide the machine address by machine
> address (AKA line by line) execution trace of DD correctly emulated by
> HHH that reaches its own "ret" instruction.
> No one made any attempt to do this because they know that this would
> prove that they are stupidly wrong to say that my trace is incorrect.
I did, on thursday at 9pm UTC.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.