Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 22:18:20 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <f14fb3c31225e2dac0513f857ecf1340@www.novabbs.com>
References: <ZirGyZChFLCJHn2I10rj5Yz94Xo@jntp> <gvqJXv44u1JJT5R5sjuZnSw_tmA@jntp> <bbycnfPRcfPN6Lf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <235a34a772f4d12300050b6bed0568b0@www.novabbs.com> <kk62gk-gjuj.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <45cfed6dc66ff19efa97744d8e0c5abb@www.novabbs.com> <3c63gk-r74l.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <902e5c8fcbae73b7c8c2abaf64cf9444@www.novabbs.com> <54m4gk-v13n.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2970545"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="jh4HcpQ+hhhSYfMNELHwaYsVz4DxLTJw0pxiKoD05d4";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cdf973c28ddff5d1d1235bf54e7ff9676b462801
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$elJkQGjwEm2UOYZ8iFBojuAf8FOmfs9Q1cZRAzKyx6w3iqeT6jkO6
Bytes: 3853
Lines: 57

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>> 
>>> In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 04/25/2024 01:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense. They depend upon the constancy of
>>>>>>>> the speed of light, which is wrong. Light speed actually varies with the
>>>>>>>> speed of the emitter. Then the optical effect of refraction was abused
>>>>>>>> to make it appear that the Sun bent the light from the stars. His
>>>>>>>> theories led to the concept of a finite but expanding universe. Now
>>>>>>>> Hubble and Webb telescopes show an infinite universe, with distant
>>>>>>>> galaxies NOT moving away at high speeds but going in all directions.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm sort of a fan of this guy: https://www.deltaveng.com/ .
>>>>>>> He demonstrates some coilguns he put together with off-the-shelf parts.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Coilguns are not railguns. Totally different technologies.
>>>>>> Arindam invented a new type of railgun with parallel rails spread wide apart, heavy armature and low voltage requirement with low reistance for high currents.
>>>>>> That design has been stolen by the US Navy and employed in its most modern ships.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Wrong on oh so many counts.
>>>> 
>>>>> After 15 years and $500 million in research, the US Navy gave up on
>>>>> railguns in 2021.
>>>> 
>>>>> Railguns were never deployed on Navy ships other than for testing.
>>>> 
>>>> The photo of their new barrel based on Arindam's new design is on Arindam's Facebook timeline. On 10 March. It shows clearly twin barrels and mentions 500 million dollars. Trials are going on.
>> 
>>> Nope, totally shut down in 2021.
>> 
>> Must have been restarted after CIA found out about Arindam's new design.

> Yeah, sure.

Right for once.

>> Anyway the photo of the gun is there on 10 Mar2024, posted all over facebook.

> Lots of utter nonsense and photos are posted to facebook.

Not this one, evidently. They have given up on the old artillery type barrel and gone in for Arindam's totally novel design. Heavy bullet perpendicular to the broad parallel rails. This design is 10-100 times better than before.

> The Navy built a bunch of railguns before giving up in 2021.

The barrels were hopeless. 

bt