Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: And the Richer Petard Horror Show resumes ...
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 07:09:43 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <f1570c198c1c9459a88784550f4d6875a8e2220b.camel@gmail.com>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me>
	 <39f1a350cac0a8431753486526da1c35f458df65@i2pn2.org>
	 <ve4aai$2b7jg$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 01:09:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fafd51d8166b5869e9175a9ccb64f709";
	logging-data="2479475"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19m9W1ySHPv4IabOjGSPsdX"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lKVoDkpfJKPZHVbMgnK1y2hNuSw=
In-Reply-To: <ve4aai$2b7jg$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2419

On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 16:05 -0600, Andr=C3=A9 G. Isaak wrote:
> On 2024-10-08 07:09, Richard Damon wrote:
> > On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
> > > ... after a short break.
> > >=20
> > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Richard -- no-one sane carries on an ex=
tended discussion with
> > > someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".=C2=A0 So which are =
you?
> > > Not sane?=C2=A0 Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone w=
ho is
> > > incapable of conceding them?=C2=A0 Or lying when you describe Peter?=
=C2=A0 You
> > > must surely have better things to do.=C2=A0 Meanwhile, you surely not=
iced
> > > that Peter is running rings around you.
> >=20
> > In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the trut=
h.
>=20
> Defence of the truth for whose sake?
>=20
> Nobody who matters takes Olcott seriously. There's no reason to defend=
=20
> 'the truth' from him.
>=20
> Andr=C3=A9
>=20

As I understand, Richard wants to make the reply to posts by olcott readabl=
e to
other occasional readers. So, responding every POOP in lengthy, sensible wa=
y as if olcott
is 'normal'.

In my opinion, 'liar' is proper ... olcott knows what is proper and what is=
 not
to fulfill his goal, of course, according to POO logic.