Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:24:11 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <f21b77862f36ab6a27fd237fda9661f8@www.novabbs.com>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <43e0a1be4a7921eb043acb58d1168ee1@www.novabbs.com> <Kaxl44IyggMeO7Ao3IslDanrquQ@jntp> <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp> <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com> <9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3407842"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$giG6K5YGy3ju3/lACTGFHuOwIK7CJp6GWsC4WGScQxaTrqJ9EPszm
Bytes: 2541
Lines: 50

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:08:01 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
> Le 15/07/2024 à 18:12, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:55:23 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
> > >
> > > To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax)
> > >
> > > No, he is a relativist like Hachel, and uses a different geometry
> for
> > > space and time problems.
> >
> > And wrong.
>
>  Prove?

It is incumbent on you to prove that they describe the real universe.
You haven't even tried to do that.

> > > Example: what is the formula giving the instantaneous speed of
> uniformly
> > > accelerated objects?
> > > Voi/c=[1+c²/2ax]^-(1/2)
> > > This formula does not exist either in Newton or Einstein.
> >
> > And does not describe anything in the universe.
>
>  No, YOU, you say that this formula does not describe anything in the
> universe.

Do you disagree?  Prove it.

> > > Another example: transformations into rotating frames of reference.
> > >
> > >
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp/Data.Media:1>
> > >
> > > These transformations do not exist neither in Newton nor in
> Einstein.
> > >
> > > R.H.
> >
> > And do not describe anything in the universe.
>
>  Idem. YOU, you say that...
>
>  R.H.

As a physicist, I do say that.  But physicists have been wrong before,
so prove
that I'm wrong.