Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: "not even trying: the corruption of real science"
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:27:13 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <f29da65516360cb7983feba36b74c3d9@www.novabbs.com>
References: <acd79a2432d9b88e06d8cca1fe8ae258@www.novabbs.com> <8b5d1dc4d5c31759b729380b6ffaee64@www.novabbs.com> <lTf6P.6652$77zd.5947@fx01.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2376468"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$in0MwaBX4/k2rrSbnGgM2OA5SgGdSOsXdi7Vh7OYDgKLH4N83GGSC
Bytes: 1961
Lines: 16

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:50:38 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> Den 11.12.2024 02:25, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> "In his memoirs Count Harry Kessler records some conversations with
>> Einstein, including one where he asked the point-blank question : do
>> your theories relate to the atomic components? And receive the equally
>> blunt answer ‘no’. Einstein gave his opinion that objects on such a
>> small scale would not be covered by his theory (See ‘Diaries of a
>> Cosmopolitan’ by Kessler, entry for Monday 14th Feb 1921)" [Newton, Zak.
>> WAS EINSTEIN WRONG? . The Electronic Book Company. Kindle Edition.]
>
> Yes, Einstein was wrong when he thought that SR wouldn't
> be applicable for "atomic components" such as electrons.
>
> QED is based on SR.
That remains to be demonstrated. Quantum physics is still hobbled by SR
but is trying to free itself from time dilation.