Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <f2ac45ffe1718a0b0070f027f0e5f58c@www.novabbs.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<f2ac45ffe1718a0b0070f027f0e5f58c@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Byte Addressability And Beyond
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 16:38:09 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <f2ac45ffe1718a0b0070f027f0e5f58c@www.novabbs.org>
References: <v0s17o$2okf4$2@dont-email.me> <62dff0b888855a31ec10c0597669423f@www.novabbs.org> <v0soai$30rmc$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2945726"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$WyI.Y4XxLZoL.1B0DyEMHe.obNJQVJ5RZxKQW5DGurk.4EJR2uqza
Bytes: 2286
Lines: 29

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Wed, 1 May 2024 03:02:07 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:

>> I don't see what is wrong with loading a container with the field and
>> then extracting or inserting into the container.

> You still need a place to put a bit offset for the base address of the 
> field. Why not put it together with the rest of the address?

Given a 20-40 year life of an architecture and the desire not to be limited
by addressability; I wanted and demanded of myself a full 63-bit virtual 
address space per thread. Therefore, no bits in the pointer are available
for bit level addressing.

>> BE means you can read the strings in a core dump
>> LE means the bytes arrive in the order for on-line arithmetic
>> LE allows one to make 8-bit wide data paths and still implement a full
>> width architecture {but then so did 360/30)

> The way I think of it is: consider how you specify these 3 conventions:
> * numbering of bits within a byte
> * numbering of bytes within a multibyte quantity
> * the place values of bits in an integer

> The only way to get all 3 consistent is with a little-endian architecture. 
> Every big-endian architecture has inconsistencies between these somewhere 
> or another.

Very many LE machines got one or more of those wrong, too.