Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<f2bcb768b53b5b22384d8a727f95be4e@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Spacetime Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 21:10:05 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <f2bcb768b53b5b22384d8a727f95be4e@www.novabbs.com> References: <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <le0krbF2j9cU1@mid.individual.net> <816c22cd6777f919d255d5b5a98551e6@www.novabbs.com> <le4hgmFk1orU5@mid.individual.net> <aa1b8ce99f8dc2406be92550817af4d7@www.novabbs.com> <lecehcFr3voU9@mid.individual.net> <3d05da1bc3e7044abccacfc8ea78eed4@www.novabbs.com> <lemntiFdpnrU4@mid.individual.net> <d9c04a0ecea25dac5c2c60c6fc3a58fa@www.novabbs.com> <17df166f901d51fb$2$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2169637"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$y3cFlZ.GsK.JJDF4KGd0Q.Mn.nBSOTBI54BRbucaTwHNLl6jibTUm Bytes: 2959 Lines: 51 Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 04.07.2024 o 18:39, gharnagel pisze: > > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > > But I tried to show, that the particle concept itself is wrong. > > > > I don't think it's possible to disprove either concept. > > > > > So, matter needs to be 'relativistic' and made from absolutely > nothing. > > > > Well, the quantum foam idea allows that, but the existence of such > > matter doesn't last long. I think that disproves that durable matter > > can come from nothing. > > > > > I had an idea for this to become possible. I just take spacetime of > GR > > > for real and assume, that spacetime would consist of kind of > 'pointlike > > > elements'. > > > > > > That is something like a point with features and higher dimensions > than > > > points in Euclidean space have. > > > > Frankly, I tend to disbelieve in the concept of spacetime. > > > > > These 'elements' are connceted multiplicative 'sideways', like a > certain > > > equation for quaternions, which is used for rotations. > > > > > > This concept is my own invention, called 'structured spacetime' and > > > needs no strings. > > > > > > It is actually relatively simple and needs only very few unusual > > > assumptions. > > > > > > One unusual assumption is: points may have features and more than > three > > > dimensions. > > > > I think points are nonexistent. They are a mental invention to > express > > geometrical concepts, just like numbers were invented to express > > mathematical > > concepts. > > Like numbers - nonexistent, right, Har, poor halfbrain? Now you're getting the idea. Good job!