Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<f2bcb768b53b5b22384d8a727f95be4e@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Spacetime
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 21:10:05 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <f2bcb768b53b5b22384d8a727f95be4e@www.novabbs.com>
References: <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <le0krbF2j9cU1@mid.individual.net> <816c22cd6777f919d255d5b5a98551e6@www.novabbs.com> <le4hgmFk1orU5@mid.individual.net> <aa1b8ce99f8dc2406be92550817af4d7@www.novabbs.com> <lecehcFr3voU9@mid.individual.net> <3d05da1bc3e7044abccacfc8ea78eed4@www.novabbs.com> <lemntiFdpnrU4@mid.individual.net> <d9c04a0ecea25dac5c2c60c6fc3a58fa@www.novabbs.com> <17df166f901d51fb$2$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2169637"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$y3cFlZ.GsK.JJDF4KGd0Q.Mn.nBSOTBI54BRbucaTwHNLl6jibTUm
Bytes: 2959
Lines: 51

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 04.07.2024 o 18:39, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > >
> > > But I tried to show, that the particle concept itself is wrong.
> >
> > I don't think it's possible to disprove either concept.
> >
> > > So, matter needs to be 'relativistic' and made from absolutely
> nothing.
> >
> > Well, the quantum foam idea allows that, but the existence of such
> > matter doesn't last long.  I think that disproves that durable matter
> > can come from nothing.
> >
> > > I had an idea for this to become possible. I just take spacetime of
> GR
> > > for real and assume, that spacetime would consist of kind of
> 'pointlike
> > > elements'.
> > >
> > > That is something like a point with features and higher dimensions
> than
> > > points in Euclidean space have.
> >
> > Frankly, I tend to disbelieve in the concept of spacetime.
> >
> > > These 'elements' are connceted multiplicative 'sideways', like a
> certain
> > > equation for quaternions, which is used for rotations.
> > >
> > > This concept is my own invention, called 'structured spacetime' and
> > > needs no strings.
> > >
> > > It is actually relatively simple and needs only very few unusual
> > > assumptions.
> > >
> > > One unusual assumption is: points may have features and more than
> three
> > > dimensions.
> >
> > I think points are nonexistent.  They are a mental invention to
> express
> > geometrical concepts, just like numbers were invented to express
> > mathematical
> > concepts.
>
> Like numbers - nonexistent, right, Har, poor halfbrain?

Now you're getting the idea.  Good job!