Article <f38koj5fht1af0ilkok52ah2d7la0g4tj1@4ax.com>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<f38koj5fht1af0ilkok52ah2d7la0g4tj1@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Censorship
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 04:29:31 -0500
Organization: What are you looking for?
Lines: 94
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <f38koj5fht1af0ilkok52ah2d7la0g4tj1@4ax.com>
References: <slrnvgcmcg.26va.dgreig@beagle.ediacara.org> <ve5ve9$2lgqh$1@dont-email.me> <ve6r8i$2pp7u$2@dont-email.me> <jubngj1f90mk2f3l93sh5du29ib09fqoa4@4ax.com> <vegt5j$nv7u$6@dont-email.me> <e4m4hjlekn8r5i6gvni5o0lssj9rejgpm8@4ax.com> <veuj1u$3flfs$1@dont-email.me> <c8kmijhriv8n0pljo7a9p05doco31tck1i@4ax.com> <9529d0d2-05af-43f9-944b-c5563fb9daba@gmail.com> <qpidnYC4youbcLb6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrnvoi1k7.13o7.dgreig@beagle.ediacara.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="67907"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4sGVHTGg+SXycvQpmUXZob6tjSM=
Bytes: 6041

On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 13:15:51 -0000 (UTC), David Greig
<dgreig@beagle.ediacara.org> wrote:

>On 2024-11-06, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
>> erik simpson <eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/6/24 3:37 AM, jillery wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:13:34 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> jillery wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Perhaps you mean "blocked" as in nobody
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I mean "Blocked from posting." I mean "Not allowed to post."
>>>>>=20
>>>>> This happened. Get over it. Move on.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> You first.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>>> responded to your
>>>>>> disinformation.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Lol!  Idiots were saying things like "unprecedented," in describing
>>>>> the supposed warming the media told them they were seeing. Which is
>>>>> retarded, because SEVERE climate changes have occurred overnight.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Literally overnight. Super volcanic eruptions have darken the =
skies,
>>>>> world wide, sparking a Volcanic Winter.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Google it.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> We're not even as warm as the last warm period! It's colder right
>>>>> now, not warmer, during the Holocene than the last interglacial...
>>>>>=20
>>>>> So there was a lot of disinformation being repeated, and I was
>>>>> responding to it and I was blocked.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> "not allowed to post" suggests some one, as opposed to some thing,
>>>> prevented you from posting.  Too bad your own cited link shows =
nothing
>>>> and nobody blocking you from T.O.:
>>>>=20
>>>> **************************
>>>> From: JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
>>>> Newsgroups: talk.origins
>>>> Subject: jillery
>>>> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 17:11:30 -0400
>>>> Organization: Eek
>>>> Message-ID: <vf3rm2$isip$1@dont-email.me>
>>>>=20
>>>>> This is the thread:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> =
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/20oZDFrDdZk/m/AC5SFgjmjzkJ
>>>> ***************************
>>>>=20
>>>> OTOH your cited zombie thread from 2011 does show posters responding
>>>> to your disinformation.  Not sure if you will ever get tired of
>>>> proving yourself wrong.
>>>>=20
>>>> --
>>>> To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
>>>>=20
>>> I imagine DIG is behind this, long overdue.  I don't know why we're=20
>>> seeing his posts at all.  Maybe some extra torture for a special =
case.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>> All I see from this piece of shit is abusive narcissism. Obviously =
can=E2=80=99t
>> communicate with others in a humble and humane manner. Ignore it, =
though
>> DIG should step in and end him.
>
>If he engages in unacceptable posting behaviour, he'll be banned.
>
>Otherwise I don't really care what he says.  Because I'd have to read
>his posts.
>
>--D.


Aye, there's the rub; "unacceptable" to whom?  The above text suggests
his posts are unacceptable to several posters.  Yet the only person
capable of actually banning him is you.  Yet you "don't really care
what he says", and so you have NOT banned him, contrary to his
original claim, the false claim I documented, which several posters
used as an excuse to exercise their inner trolls.

--=20
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge