Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<f4577b5c9f6bb8de6f30ee3db4757cd1608b5be0@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:48:24 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <f4577b5c9f6bb8de6f30ee3db4757cd1608b5be0@i2pn2.org> References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <e4ed8ffadcc8172597d07c9786c52a6a664d11c3@i2pn2.org> <v60rgn$1kr1q$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:48:24 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1900402"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2375 Lines: 30 Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 07:23:50 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 7/2/2024 6:32 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Mon, 01 Jul 2024 20:25:40 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows that when >>> HHH emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop, >>> Infinite_Recursion, and DDD that it must abort these emulations so >>> that itself can terminate normally. >> At the cost of not doing the full simulation. If you want it to >> terminate. > This <is> the problem that I am willing to discuss. So why must a pure simulator terminate? >>> When this is construed as non-halting criteria then simulating >>> termination analyzer HHH is correct to reject these inputs as >>> non-halting by returning 0 to its caller. >> It gets the decider part right, but not the simulator part. >>> Simulating termination analyzers must report on the behavior that >>> their finite string input specifies thus HHH must report that DDD >>> correctly emulated by HHH remains stuck in recursive simulation. Which is not what DDD does, since the HHH that it calls detects a recursive simulation and aborts it, returning and terminating. >> Of course we want the right answer, which is not whatever HHH makes up, >> but what the input DDD does by itself. Do you understand the difference? -- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott: Objectively I am a genius.