Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery)
Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
Subject: Re: The Lime sock on Stephan Pickering and NAMBLA
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:54:58 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <f47f5a8956d0ffbb680eed36588aba5e@www.novabbs.com>
References: <31c157534183ddc0956f4b7fafb50192@www.novabbs.com> <dc9bddc8b60ca868d59b860e020f53d8@www.novabbs.com> <b58bbff4c5a2b910bbb883426146fa37@www.novabbs.com> <26ac92e674f8791ba06c1f8c3a7c8979@www.novabbs.com> <052d159692588d3c3ac31f179a923d9c@www.novabbs.com> <96d5330063c91bc4d4ba29991c2f76ad@www.novabbs.com> <c9b5f800e2939e78e29f148202b59ed2@www.novabbs.com> <4dc0c2dcd3748ba6144938e6e5eed541@www.novabbs.com> <0ae47662d5bbd64a8ec1df08ecb90de3@www.novabbs.com> <07ed3b38b0459f9a4dd37ac4e37b04f6@www.novabbs.com> <eb7349ae13ddf1affeeb2d747c6cfa87@www.novabbs.com> <f5f1b26f765d4f6c54a0405b0568e1a0@www.novabbs.com> <5552f335d0cfe6cc9e2dc87f47126646@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1785697"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Vf9CM7g99yqfGvzEHTw0bhrjcIfvzYBBhUuRma0rLuQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: acd0b3e3614eaa6f47211734e4cbca3bfd42bebc
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$eyj45Ib9b8lf1DfZZjWMP.XO5YIWA148bKre4LwaUmzCFzIS1/tlK
Bytes: 7521
Lines: 124

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:49:20 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:39:15 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MMP) aka
> "HarryLime" wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:15:50 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
>>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:23:41 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MMP) aka
>>> "HarryLime"aka "HarryLime" wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 0:13:13 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
>
>>>>> My reason for opening a new thread would be because you're constantly
>>>>> bringing up my poem in unrelated threads, as per your M.O. which I
>>>>> already noted. (As that contained a few typos), I'll copy it in here:
>>>>>
>>>>> "That's been your regular M.O. since you showed up. Whenever I try to
>>>>> have
>>>>> a conversation with Will, about anything, you jump in and start spewing
>>>>> false claims about something else, in the mistaken belief that I'd only
>>>>> have two options:
>>>>> (1) try to refute your false claims, in which case you've successfully
>>>>> disrupted the conversation; or
>>>>> (2) ignore them (in which some people might think those false claims of
>>>>> yours are actually true)."
>>>>
>>>> When you're having a conversation *about me*, you mean to say, deceitful
>>>> George.
>>>>
>>>> If you make false statements about me on a social media platform
>>>> (libel), you should expect, at very least, a refutation.
>
> I opened this thread to respond to false statements you were making
> about your flame war on Stephan, Will, myself, and others on other
> threads. No one has said it wasn't about you.
>
>>>>>> To save time, why don't you just bump the old thread up to the top of
>>>>>> the feed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rereading it requires much less time on both our parts than repeating
>>>>>> the same points that we'd made at the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> HarryLiar, no one is asking you to comment on that thread (or any of the
>>>>> other threads I've opened FTM). If you have nothing to say on the poem,
>>>>> you're more than welcome to sit that one out.
>>>>
>>>> Since the Subject of this thread is "Re: The Lime sock on Stephan
>>>> Pickering and NAMBLA" (and since "The Lime sock[sic]" is the latest
>>>> childish name you have come up with to call me
>>>
>>> Ever the hypocrite here's Michael Pendragon whining about childish name
>>> calling when he's the one who began that practice here years ago.
>>
>> I'm not complaining about the name-calling, Donkey.
>>
>> I'm merely pointing out that "The Lime sock[sic]" is George Dance's
>> latest name for me.
>
> Get with the program. Precisely because of the whining about your
> petname that Will mentioned, I changed it several days ago.
>
>> The reason I am pointing this out is because it appears in the Subject
>> header for this thread -- indicating that this thread is about me; and
>> that it purportedly presents my opinions (reworded by Mr. Dance, of
>> course) on the topics of Pickles Pickering and NAMBLA.
>
> No, Lying Michael; this thread was a response to comments that you were
> making about your flaming of Stephan (in another thread for deflection
> purposes, as per your M.O.) You comments were quoted fairly and
> accurately, not "reworded" in the slightest.
>
> You're welcome to talk about them here; but be warned that going
> forward, if you attempt to deflect by talking about something else, your
> comments will be snipped here, and moved to the appropriate thread where
> necessary.
>
>> Mr. Dance was whining that I am butting in on what was intended to be a
>> conversation between the two of you.
>
> No, Lying Michael. I am "whining" about you (once again) immediately
> trying to change the subject of the discussion to something else. Your
> first comment in this thread was to call me a liar (presumably just for
> preemption). Your second was a misrepresentation of something I'd said
> in the "Psychology of MPP" thread which I'd already dealt with on that
> thread, so you simply repeated it here. Your third comment contained
> both a lie and a faked quote about my poem "My Father's House". (Both
> the latter two have been moved to the "My Father's House" thread Will
> opened, if you're willing to talk about them there.)
>
>> I am pointing out that this
>> so-called conversation is a one-sided affair in which Mr. Dance attempts
>> to put forth libelous statements about me.
>
> It's hardly a one-sided conversation, HarryLiar, when and all my posts
> in it (including the OP) have been replies to you, and you've written
> more posts in it than I have,  Please stop whining about being excluded
> from it, since you obviously are not.
>
>> If Mr. Dance had not wanted me to "butt in" on his "conversation," he
>> would not have included my name (his latest name for me, that is) in the
>> Subject header.
>
> Now you're supporting your earlier lie with fake quotes, which did not
> come from anything I said, but came from you.
>
>>> Tit for Tat is a concept that still seems to go over his head.
>>>
>>> And so it goes.
>>
>> Tit for Tat is a concept that I abandoned somewhere before having
>> attended Kindergarten.  Unfortunately, I cannot say the same for you and
>> George.
>
> No, Lying Michael. You continually rely on the concept. You may not
> believe in govern your own behavior by reciprocal ethics - there's no
> sign that your behavior is governed by any ethics - but you clearly pay
> lip service to T4T to try to justify your behavior.
>
> For instance, every time that you "attack" (troll and flame) someone,
> you try to justify it with a story (sometimes true, sometimes not) that
> they attacked you first. That's been the gist of every one of your
> on-topic statements about the Team Monkey flamewar; that you and your
> team went after Stephan, Will, and myself because they "attacked" you
> first.

Which is basically Tit for Tat without the position uses of it.

😏