Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery)
Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
Subject: Re: The Psycho-epistemolgy of MMP
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:28:13 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <f4a098606950b1144e0f3ca245b509f2@www.novabbs.com>
References: <agednQfwfc2I0AD6nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com> <RImcndwGP8Ji_AP6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3139658"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Vf9CM7g99yqfGvzEHTw0bhrjcIfvzYBBhUuRma0rLuQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: acd0b3e3614eaa6f47211734e4cbca3bfd42bebc
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Ua9RPaITTH5czmZRL2tkMO6GDIDxn2Rd240wssLSQO4R1QSdmRV.m

On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 18:03:43 +0000, MummyChunk wrote:

>> Will-Dockery wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 4:07:04 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
>>>
>>> moved from
>>>
> https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=254114&group=alt.arts.poe
> try.comments#254114
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 0:20:56 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
>>>
>>> That's Michael Pendragon, always the Peter Keating styled second hander.
>>>
>>> Essentially we're in agreement; but I have to raise two non-essential
>>> points of disagreement. First, I would rather not refer to the subject
>>> as "Pendragon." The subject's real name is unknown; "Michael
> Pendragon"
>>> is just one of his socks, albeit the most prolific one. I would prefer
>>> to refer to him as "MMP" (which doesn't mean you have to, of
> course, if
>>> you disagree).
>>>
>>> Second, I don't think that Peter Keating is the best 'type' to describe
>>> MMP in the novel. Both Keating and MMP are social metaphysicians - they
>>> think that reality is whatever people believe it is, the
> "consensus"
>>> view of reality. But so do half the novel. Where those two are different
>>> is that Keating is content to follow the consensus, while MMP believes
>>> he can actually control reality by controlling others' beliefs. That
>>> makes him more like two of Rand's other protagonists from that novel,
>>> Gail Wynand and Ellsworth Toohey. Which of those matches him best is
>>> still an open question.
>>>
>>> Why does Michael Pendragon lie and misrepresent so much?
>>>
>>> MMP has told us he was abused as a boy, and I think that fact is key.
>>> Lying is one tactic children usually try at some point to escape
>>> punishment, and an abused child has all the more reason to keep at it ad
>>> learn how to do it successfully. Since MMP comes across as clever (at
>>> least 120 IQ), it is also fair to think that he was able to learn to lie
>>> successfully. So it is fair to conclude that he did learn to lie
>>> successfully, and escape punishment, more than once.
>>>
>>> While no one can blame a child in that position for lying, his doing so
>>> successfully would be giving him the wrong feedback, making him think
>>> that he actually was changing reality by changing his parents' beliefs -
>>> telling him that in fact reality was whatever one wanted it to be, and
>>> that he could be that one.
>>>
>>> More later, but I wanted to get these two points on record quickly.
>>>
>>> Here it is, lest we forget.
>>>
>>> Pendragon, the little green monkey, revealed.
>>>
>>> 😏
>>>
>>>
>> He sure can trigger you, donkey.
>
>
>
> Not really, Rudy.
>
>  😏
>
>
> No one should ever get triggered by someone on the internet.  We are all
> stronger than that I think....
>
>
> This is a response to the post seen at:
> http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=682126454#682126454

Again, agreed.