Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: cpu-x
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 15:10:46 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <f4vk3j1ibrm4f4adtpjugq51emr9riutmq@4ax.com>
References: <v1b791$2ln8f$2@dont-email.me> <ib8i3jpsn8qgcsl4l3a5lin9lan9men5t1@4ax.com> <v1b8br$2ln8f$3@dont-email.me> <6639497b$0$6450$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <5mki3j93um0k1hghpjbda84qqpgtf3odqs@4ax.com> <66399f5c$0$6558$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 21:10:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="314728003d6ffd9d5fa7aed9211bbc43";
	logging-data="3605177"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lJTVEXzUePhg5w6yiWiYUHPoOeFqhwys="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aABSMjKOTmLVsYry+LE795G7i74=
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2226

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>>> The entire GuhNoo/Linux bizarro world can't compete with the one
>>> Slovakian commercial developer that created HWiNFO for Windows.
>> 
>> CPU-X does what your utility does, probably better.
>
>You're still confused.
>
>CPU-X (Linux) is an inferior clone of CPU-Z (Windows).
>
>HWiNFO (Windows only) is far superior to both, and to EVERY Linux app of 
>its kind that I've seen.
>
>I don't know why Bloaty even brought up CPU-X; it's not in the same 
>league as HWiNFO.


What is better about it?

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.