| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<fMlGX9rTEIAV0i44vtrj7MY4w7Q@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <fMlGX9rTEIAV0i44vtrj7MY4w7Q@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Sync two clocks References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <17ec3040cf2f4e8f$429420$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 7pz9Vp7kBWlRNbt5SyshjCzKJW8 JNTP-ThreadID: KqCy9G15x7A9xZN_JLsoNRe49xU JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=fMlGX9rTEIAV0i44vtrj7MY4w7Q@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 16 Aug 24 12:27:41 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-16T12:27:41Z/8988862"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> Bytes: 3251 Lines: 52 Le 16/08/2024 à 12:56, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 16.08.2024 o 12:47, Python pisze: >> Le 15/08/2024 à 21:38, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>> >>> The notion of universal anisochrony means that each watch will lag >>> behind the other with an anisochrony Et=x/c, a reciprocal phenomenon >>> that will affect all the watches in the universe. >>> >>>> How naive is it possible to be? >>> >>>> You don't sync two clocks to each other, you sync one clock >>> to another clock. >>> >>> You still don't understand. >> >> You completely messed up your quotes above. Anyway... >> >> You're probably a bit intellectually challenged to understand a >> procedure that is fairly simple, just as you were in 2007 when you >> miserably demonstrated it back then: >> >> https://groups.google.com/g/fr.sci.physique/c/KgqI9gqTkR8/m/oMc9X0XjCWMJ >> >> If the meaning of t_A, t_B, and t'_A are still unknown to you, you can >> refer to Einstein 1905 article. >> >> t_A is the time shown by clock A when a light signal is emitted; >> >> t_B is the time shown by clock B when the signal is received and >> re-emitted; >> >> t'_A is the time shown by clock A when the returned signal is received. >> >> Given that your stubbornness in not wanting to understand what you don't >> get at the first reading is even stronger than your stupidity (which is >> saying something!), I doubt you'll even try to comprehend. However, here >> are a few intermediate exercises to help you understand what most people >> grasp on the first try: >> >> 1. Using the hypothesis (confirmed by experiment) that: > > A lie, as expected from a relativistic idiot - > the hypothesis was no way confirmed. But it > was a self-denying absurd instead. I answered him, but it will take him at least thirty years to understand what I am trying to explain. He's a clown. R.H. R.H.