Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the
 semantics of the x86 language
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:23:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <fa167f5ae95fbcccc73021102b40b27f410336ad@i2pn2.org>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5sbpt$1kfbr$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sjsa$msl0$1@dont-email.me> <v5skc9$1kfbr$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v5smuk$n7a2$1@dont-email.me> <v5sorr$1kfbr$10@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sp4v$nnko$1@dont-email.me> <v5sr4t$1kfbq$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5srjn$o1o0$1@dont-email.me> <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me> <v5su4q$1kfbr$11@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sv8o$ogo5$1@dont-email.me> <v5t0h8$1kfbr$12@i2pn2.org>
	<v5t1af$omq9$1@dont-email.me> <v5t3h4$1kfbr$13@i2pn2.org>
	<v5t470$t0hj$1@dont-email.me> <v5u2o5$1mj7k$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5u8li$12udb$3@dont-email.me> <v5vi6t$1oanb$8@i2pn2.org>
	<v5vlv2$1b0k9$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:23:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2014902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2791
Lines: 30

Am Mon, 01 Jul 2024 20:42:58 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/1/2024 7:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/1/24 8:49 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/1/2024 6:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/30/24 10:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/30/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/30/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/30/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/30/24 9:03 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/30/2024 7:44 PM,
>>>>>>>> Richard Damon wrote:

>>>>>> And, since the HHH that DDD calls will abort is emulation, it WILL
>>>>>> return to DDD and it will return also.

>>>> The emulation stops, and the emulating behavor of HHH stops, but not
>>>> the behavior of the input.

>> The "Behavior of the Input" comes from the input alone, and doesn't
>> depend on the emulator doing anything.
>> 
> Static strings do not become dynamic processes unless and until they are
> simulated.
> 
>> The emulation only REVEALS the behavior to the decider, not create it.

The input describes a program that doesn’t stop when run, regardless
whether you actually run it (in part or whole).

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.