Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<fa3f8022c4bb72cfb77ce55b82fa0191@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The purpose of science Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:49:21 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <fa3f8022c4bb72cfb77ce55b82fa0191@www.novabbs.com> References: <17dea0394e40408e$988$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <66887E6B.397@ix.netcom.com> <les13bF7uhdU2@mid.individual.net> <17df879faf8c6f0a$657$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <les4lkF8eadU2@mid.individual.net> <17df8d2de8223cb2$404$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <lev14fFl85bU4@mid.individual.net> <17dfe1ed3b8cfcab$313$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <668AD032.15DE@ix.netcom.com> <17e002f734f53bd4$316$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <668AECC9.BAE@ix.netcom.com> <17e007431ff9c1c1$317$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <883aa4202c961566bd42c7280d458632@www.novabbs.com> <17e021c86cc1daa9$407$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <efe37c339293460e87ce0dbd753c703f@www.novabbs.com> <17e0431d45ffe75f$434$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17e0436ea492cb98$435$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2584174"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$yhWz1eXcTXHaArB3K3qDeeTSHEwG30RPQOs0btjNck5e0N7LbGrvO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 Bytes: 2358 Lines: 20 On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:33:20 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 08.07.2024 o 16:27, Maciej Wozniak pisze: > > > > W dniu 08.07.2024 o 16:03, gharnagel pisze: > > > > > > Wozzie's autism is speaking again. The measurement could be labeled > > > A, B, C, D or Low, Medium, High or just about anything. > > > > How it happens then that your so called "scientific > > method" idiocy is always pointing a number as a prediction > > of the result? Because it's CONVENIENT, DUH! > And - how do you get A, or B, or C, or D from > "comparison to a standard"? Standard A, Standard B, Standard C and Standard D. DUH! (I didn't say it was convenient :-))