Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 22:34:08 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <fa4c67b821d878e63361ec2ce15d31de@www.novabbs.com>
References: <b5ba611c3f8b7f5fb1eab57ceca6bde0@www.novabbs.com> <jhd9tk-5o291.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <2153337abb8142a9e22490fce8b59942@www.novabbs.com> <qaeatk-h37a1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <283f3ba1862fb001bfbf1b6721dd99ff@www.novabbs.com> <rpnguk-snlg.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <6d24a73fc5403dde6604f314c5cc879d@www.novabbs.com> <068ruk-rfvv.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <6e9add054ebc945d951f3f21667c1995@www.novabbs.com> <ihavuk-8em51.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <a139e80ee9286563d1191ac96d0c6705@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3815233"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$xlArKGl2ICFUjOaB33cet.APc3hU5pOMVfp1AXteW5MMDEbStx2za
Bytes: 4650
Lines: 81

On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:08:51 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 14:22:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 1:17:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 1:36:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Quite likely the penisnino is a Dark Age Inquisitor type Bible thumper.
>>>>>>> Always trying to replace science with sanctioned nonsense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Delusional babble of a multiple personality crackpot and typical thereof
>>>>>> when confronted by facts that challenge the crackpot's delusions, e.g.
>>>>>> that efficiency is generally trivial to measure and that real railguns
>>>>>> have efficiencies of around 50%.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wonder from which thin air that was pulled from.
>>>>
>>>> How many references to that would you like as there are hundreds of
>>>> them, crackpot.
>>>
>>> Do they all say 50%, Penisnino?
>>> Not even the stupidest of physicists would be as ridiculous as you,
>>> Penisnino.
>>>>
>>>>> Arindam's new maths for rail gun efficiency shows the relation between
>>>>> efficiency with respect to current and gun design.
>>>>
>>>> Efficiency is DEFINED as energy out divided by energy in, delusional
>>>> crackpot.
>>>
>>> Which is always 50% according to you, Penisnino.
>>
>> No, crackpot, what I actually said was that real railguns in the real
>> world currently have achieved an efficiency of about 50%.
>
> No they don't, liar and fool.
> Their efficiencies are very very low in terms of missile kinetic energy
> and input energies. That way comparable to ancient cannons.
> When barrel wear is taken into consideration then the effectiveness as
> compared to just efficiency is such that the whole rail gun project with
> its existing designs was abandoned.
>>
>> The worst designs have efficiencies of about 1%, which still makes your
>> claim of a design that is 1,000 times more efficient laughable,
>> crackpot.
>
> As a reactionless cyclic motor Arindam's design makes efficiency
> considerations meaningless for it operates on his superior physics
> involving velocity addition.
>
> As a gun efficiency in terms of kinetic energy from  missile velocity
> over energy input is certainly more than 1000 times better than the
> failed existing US railguns. Their efficiency going by facts told to
> Arindam at an international conference was very low, with too much heat
> loss due to ohmic loss in the barrel and conductors. Arindam's design
> using the heavy armature and much lower voltages cuts down the heat
> losses by a 1000 times at least, making it practical for many
> engineering applications.
>
>
>>
>> <snip remaining insanity>
>
> Penisnino is simply a common stupid racist bigots

D
Should be "bigot" instead of "bigots" as written above. Although I have
no doubt that Penisnino has more than enough bigotry to fit quite a few
bigots.



but being stupid he
> does not have the suave hypocrisy of the European alpha apes
>
> Woof-woof
>
> Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)