Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 07:10:40 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <fa5c3bc8cae383ed9c8218c856e7730ab96c4b8a@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
 <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
 <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me>
 <vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me> <von0iq$3d619$1@dont-email.me>
 <vondj5$3ffar$1@dont-email.me> <vopke4$3v10c$1@dont-email.me>
 <vorlah$aet5$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:10:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="302815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vorlah$aet5$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3811
Lines: 76

On 2/15/25 10:16 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 2/15/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-02-14 12:40:04 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 2/14/2025 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2025-02-14 00:07:23 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that 
>>>>>>>>>> article
>>>>>>>>>> before or when HHH
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been 
>>>>>>>>> talking about in this forum for several years.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about 
>>>>>>>> that paper.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line 
>>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>> a false claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
>>>>>>> Earth can possibly show otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
>>>>>> In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
>>>>>> that is not obvious.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you try to show the steps attempting to show that
>>>>> it is false I will point out the error.
>>>>
>>>> Step 1: Find people who know C.
>>>> Step 2: Show them DD of OP and ask.
>>>>
>>>>> This is the only topic that I will discuss and any
>>>
>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>
>>> int DD()
>>> {
>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int main()
>>> {
>>>    HHH(DD);
>>> }
>>>
>>> DD  correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally.
>>
>> That claim has already shown to be false. Nothing above shows that
>> HHH does not return 0. If it does DD also returns 0.
>>
> 
> When we know that DD is simulated by HHH we know that
> HHH cannot possibly return to this DD as long as we
> have at least a little competence in the C language.
> 
> 
> 

But the problem is that is bad knowledge, ad HHH does not CORRECTLY 
simulate its input, and thus to presume it does is an error.

Your logic is just built on LIES.