| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<fa7e33d953bc6f545387d862e19c2bd2@www.novabbs.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Is Parallel Programming Hard, And, If So, What Can You Do About =?UTF-8?B?SXQ/?= Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 23:33:42 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: <fa7e33d953bc6f545387d862e19c2bd2@www.novabbs.org> References: <vvnds6$3gism$1@dont-email.me> <edb59b7854474033c748f0fd668badaa@www.novabbs.org> <w32UP.481123$C51b.217868@fx17.iad> <vvqdas$g9oh$1@dont-email.me> <vvrcs9$msmc$2@dont-email.me> <0ec5d195f4732e6c92da77b7e2fa986d@www.novabbs.org> <vvribg$npn4$1@dont-email.me> <vvs343$ulkk$1@dont-email.me> <vvtt4d$1b8s7$4@dont-email.me> <2025May13.094035@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vvuuua$1mt7m$1@dont-email.me> <vvvons$3uvs3$2@dont-email.me> <1000nfp$2440u$1@dont-email.me> <1000pae$3uvs3$3@dont-email.me> <100bdhq$lhdb$3@dont-email.me> <91c8a31fc5d04a1fadf210b2dd6d4875@www.novabbs.org> <100e0it$19264$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1090753"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="o5SwNDfMfYu6Mv4wwLiW6e/jbA93UAdzFodw5PEa6eU"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: cb29269328a20fe5719ed6a1c397e21f651bda71 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$kC3KgXirzanEQYL1kOt9Pe0.0OT30I2c6lTTs1XZi2SRp7MkmQoAm Bytes: 2256 Lines: 18 On Mon, 19 May 2025 1:13:01 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2025 00:18:23 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote: > >> On Sun, 18 May 2025 1:35:54 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> For “recent”, let’s say “within the last 10 seconds”. >> >> Principle is reasonable, specified time is not. >> >> A 4MB cache can be filled in 1ms when memory performs at (only) 4GB/s >> (and the memory systems are up in the 40GB/s peak territory while caches >> remain rather small (several GB at most).) > > Filesystem cache turnover happens in times on the order of seconds, not > milliseconds. Yes, running at the latency and bandwidth of the disk/SSD subsystem not of the DRAM system.