Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<fa7e33d953bc6f545387d862e19c2bd2@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Parallel Programming Hard, And, If So, What Can You Do About
 =?UTF-8?B?SXQ/?=
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 23:33:42 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <fa7e33d953bc6f545387d862e19c2bd2@www.novabbs.org>
References: <vvnds6$3gism$1@dont-email.me> <edb59b7854474033c748f0fd668badaa@www.novabbs.org> <w32UP.481123$C51b.217868@fx17.iad> <vvqdas$g9oh$1@dont-email.me> <vvrcs9$msmc$2@dont-email.me> <0ec5d195f4732e6c92da77b7e2fa986d@www.novabbs.org> <vvribg$npn4$1@dont-email.me> <vvs343$ulkk$1@dont-email.me> <vvtt4d$1b8s7$4@dont-email.me> <2025May13.094035@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vvuuua$1mt7m$1@dont-email.me> <vvvons$3uvs3$2@dont-email.me> <1000nfp$2440u$1@dont-email.me> <1000pae$3uvs3$3@dont-email.me> <100bdhq$lhdb$3@dont-email.me> <91c8a31fc5d04a1fadf210b2dd6d4875@www.novabbs.org> <100e0it$19264$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1090753"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="o5SwNDfMfYu6Mv4wwLiW6e/jbA93UAdzFodw5PEa6eU";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cb29269328a20fe5719ed6a1c397e21f651bda71
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$kC3KgXirzanEQYL1kOt9Pe0.0OT30I2c6lTTs1XZi2SRp7MkmQoAm
Bytes: 2256
Lines: 18

On Mon, 19 May 2025 1:13:01 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Mon, 19 May 2025 00:18:23 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 May 2025 1:35:54 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> For “recent”, let’s say “within the last 10 seconds”.
>>
>> Principle is reasonable, specified time is not.
>>
>> A 4MB cache can be filled in 1ms when memory performs at (only) 4GB/s
>> (and the memory systems are up in the 40GB/s peak territory while caches
>> remain rather small (several GB at most).)
>
> Filesystem cache turnover happens in times on the order of seconds, not
> milliseconds.

Yes, running at the latency and bandwidth of the disk/SSD subsystem
not of the DRAM system.