Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:03:31 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <fbabd4f1c93e675b336c8ed00a182d4b@www.novabbs.com>
References: <27cf5f58333a92a17fb129caf2cafdd7@www.novabbs.com> <e5568ab7bb5732a4e7c70a64117a7efd@www.novabbs.com> <25a0d003c5b33a49f03e0abeecfc94a2@www.novabbs.com> <6735279b$0$12947$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <5a6d4aafdc6bef1e4410c8c306aa09ac@www.novabbs.com> <6735d63c$1$16832$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <42079e861a831c1258353bda7f9b7772@www.novabbs.com> <67367037$0$28073$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <vh71i3$3b1vr$1@dont-email.me> <673713f3$0$28068$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2578519"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$OqTe5/Wp.lUC5IcFUCd4r.UYEggSbX14lhgWLyUaJ9cF3sElH0UsO
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2657
Lines: 28

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 9:27:15 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2024-11-14 21:48:39 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jan: An inconsistent theory does not predict. Relativity is an ideology,
>>>> so you are ironically projecting your faults onto others. Then you don't
>>>> know what you are defending because you can't tell me what it predicts.
>>>
>>> No quoted text, no reply,
>>
>> Not even an indication of which Jan he is referring to. Can he not know
>> that we have two sane people of that name here?
>
> Yes. The LCC entity often picks up some trigger word to go of on a rant
> of its own, with little or no relation to the input.
>
> It would be best if we all stopped replying to such postings.
> This is just a plainly wrong idea of usenet posting, so abuse,

I prefer responding to those of us who evidently "once upon a time"
were bright, highly accomplished individuals, but who in their
retirement years have become consumed by an obsession against SR
and/or Einstein. In a quarter century of visiting these newsgroups,
I have actually witnessed a single fringe poster make his way back
to sanity. It is my hope to witness such a phenomenon again.