Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 20:52:17 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <fc54tk-u6h11.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <c596f37eaeac082fce8f501ced6c4cd6@www.novabbs.com> <l0iusk-6k8p.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17fa89eb836365a5$121040$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <rjq0tk-4dhs.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <0f163c5194ace41af71d6c5b3c9641de@www.novabbs.com> <g201tk-f2ps.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <f748b62dd174a60499571fe91f87d5ba@www.novabbs.com> <uof3tk-0vk01.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <75a0474a69c10683e1a5bb4dc558eae7@www.novabbs.com> <08r3tk-0t311.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <a32ea42841dc616462284b590945ed31@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 06:01:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6199553bdfa5ea75f003201fcecbc17e";
	logging-data="116541"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4M2deR5s0ug0td9+TDZ9m"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-122-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5V9dEkbTwKk/hKbNd4o3V17LW/k=
Bytes: 4512

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 0:59:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:43:28 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:03:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:30:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> W dniu 02.10.2024 o 02:51, Jim Pennino pisze:
>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 9:06:50 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What follows from Arindamic physics is the permanent motion machine,
>>>>>>>>>>>> creating energy indefinitely. A minor version of the workings of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> universe, where energy is created and disdipated in its infinite
>>>>>>>>>>>> vastness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arindam bets that when he makes such a machine the penisninos (they
>>>>>>>>>>>> number in billions) will still continue to abuse and ignore him. Frauds
>>>>>>>>>>>> and fools are like that!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apes being apes, ape. No matter what nonsense is spouted by beloved or
>>>>>>>>>>> feared alpha-apes. That explains the success of relativity theories, so
>>>>>>>>>>> incredibly ridiculous.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The success of relativity theories is because every experiment since
>>>>>>>>>> 1905
>>>>>>>>>> confirms them,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, it is because some fanatic religious
>>>>>>>>> maniacs like yourself lie experiments
>>>>>>>>> confirm them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So where is your experiment with data and math that contradicts Einstein
>>>>>>>> or are you just yet another arm waving and babbling crackpot?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The inertia violation experiment using the new rail gun designed by
>>>>>>> Arindam validates Maxwellian electrodynamics and throws out
>>>>>>> Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics. As lack of reaction is predicted by
>>>>>>> F=Bil for the former and NOT by the latter where energy from current
>>>>>>> moves as particles in a loop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean your silly "expriment" with no data and no math Anirandam?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unlike the computer art presented as science by the esteemed e=mcc
>>>>
>>>> The first experimental proofs of Einstein's theories were done long
>>>> before there was any such thing as computer art crackpot.
>>>
>>> There are no experimental proofs of Einstein's theories,
>>
>> Thousand upon thousand Arindam.
> 
> Name one.

OK, since you seem so hung up on e=mc^2 I'll start with special
relativity.

Fizeau experiment
Michelson–Morley experiment
Kaufmann–Bucherer–Neumann experiments
Trouton–Noble experiment
Rayleigh and Brace experiments
Trouton–Rankine experiment
Ives–Stilwell experiment

That gets us to 1938.