Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<fd4e3eb680f11e7b5abb2f69b0e8feff@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: A Web app showing =?UTF-8?B?RWluc3RlaW4tUG9pbmNhcsOpIFN5bmNocm9uaXph?= =?UTF-8?B?dGlvbiBwcm9jZWR1cmU=?= Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 17:08:53 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <fd4e3eb680f11e7b5abb2f69b0e8feff@www.novabbs.com> References: <vb9t4r$3smhq$2@dont-email.me> <17f217dd9c7a6b40$820525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vba2j7$3spoe$11@dont-email.me> <dbc1a9e6296f37e29f3494fc81a602a1@www.novabbs.com> <vbhjs3$1cg6l$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1203285"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="ovbq/l84ala/wLhXSqScU9GOSIzjukMrxJB27Aq7eyg"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$qrDMxJ7lBkuRfH2pLv1z3u1faAzPdhuqDnpU6jenPYGHpftkFBUBS X-Rslight-Posting-User: c1a997029c70f718720f72156b7d7f56416caf7c Bytes: 2079 Lines: 20 On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:18:59 +0000, Python wrote: > I would definitely suggest Brython instead of JS :-) And definitely > Python instead of C# :-)) Let's not get into language wars here! Python, for all its renown as a language great for rapid prototyping, is SLOW. And I would not use it in large projects. Dynamic typing seems convenient at first, but it can be an albatross around your neck if you are coding a complex application. Of course, there is Mypy. I would not use python for CPU intensive computations like the following computation of the Newtonian contribution to Mercury's precession: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8XIf0XcrpOcV1RwMk9QNzBzVU0?resourcekey=0-5EfA3Gf3b5Ha8i2TANPcHQ (I believe that Paul Anderson published a similar graph that was more accurate than mine because he did not use the simplification of coplanar orbits. My figures are a bit high.)