Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 20:44:44 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <fd67be5bdeeb7f9a15ebd084a809f800@www.novabbs.com>
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com> <10140pm$2huu3$1@dont-email.me> <211597acf09cc21af2125ea3c9fe12d4@www.novabbs.com> <101acbb$188t$1@dont-email.me> <a18977a79cf92b54c28e3e65395ab113@www.novabbs.com> <101cpl6$isnr$1@dont-email.me> <1844830cac6ece08$164805$1966588$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <844a0d83caeacd8dae32487821889fb8@www.novabbs.com> <goH_P.892794$BFJ.19100@fx13.ams4> <1844b1dd9110820c$262985$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2739608"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$z4EaBGwtQXHYxbSxDyfRxuPIUFewFGAuGAdHe8c3G20ReK47KTCUm
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 2603
Lines: 30

On Sat, 31 May 2025 19:01:59 +0000, Maciej Woźniak wrote:

> On 5/31/2025 8:01 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> Den 31.05.2025 16:33, skrev rhertz:
>>> On Sat, 31 May 2025 4:44:04 +0000, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/30/2025 7:31 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Didn't you know that it is experimental evidence
>>>>> that determines the validity of a theory?\
>>>>
>>>> Paul, only idiots as incompetent as you
>>>> are can believe such a nonsensical lie.
>>>
>>>
>>> In science, deductive reasoning is used to test hypotheses, where a
>>> general rule or theory is applied to a specific situation to see if the
>>> prediction holds true.
>>
>> I note with interest that Richard Hertz and Maciej Woźniak
>> agree that it is plain wrong that experimental evidence determines
>> the validity of a theory of physics.
>
> As said: only idiots as incompetent as you
> are can believe such a nonsensical lie.
>
Paul is really mistaken here because the validity of a theory depends on
its derivation. An invalid derivation doesn't predict anymore than
astrology does. The prediction of a doubling of the Newtonian is not
valid. It does not predict.