Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:11:36 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <fdcbff701accc10c3d5a15313b94a2a2a042f14f@i2pn2.org>
References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me> <vqkp9h$sm8g$1@dont-email.me>
	<499f2673-f99b-4b6d-a0df-55242e7dc479@att.net>
	<vqm8kt$18j9k$1@dont-email.me>
	<4209f4c4-0c11-40a8-93bb-441e45f5e9e1@att.net>
	<vqn70n$1f2cq$1@dont-email.me>
	<fcb3e892-dd81-48d1-81b6-fe06258ee888@att.net>
	<vqnfni$1fm18$1@dont-email.me>
	<00dcba19-ae5b-401e-8222-b686d235023e@att.net>
	<vqos6h$1rnm5$3@dont-email.me>
	<161aa4b1-ca5a-4447-a7a7-c82ae2ebf5f6@att.net>
	<vqptqb$22s3r$3@dont-email.me>
	<4aca9f75-07ba-4ad4-a215-948a4420f2aa@att.net>
	<vqq9ul$25s9e$1@dont-email.me>
	<7d30b44b-eb53-4ead-9188-99f243521dc8@att.net>
	<vqrili$2hcq0$1@dont-email.me>
	<1a0b4566-e625-4b18-8139-a34c8d5e7515@att.net>
	<vqs0ov$2k7oh$1@dont-email.me>
	<45c16a17-6843-4eba-bc5f-fb6815801afb@att.net>
	<vqspl4$2p6pc$1@dont-email.me> <vqspsb$2ponj$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqsq78$2p6pb$3@dont-email.me> <vqt0to$2r72o$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqu7nd$3595f$3@dont-email.me> <vquaa1$36g72$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqubcp$36bb3$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:11:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4185523"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

Am Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:18:01 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 13.03.2025 10:59, FromTheRafters wrote:

>> I happen to know that the naturals are exemplary of the smallest
>> inductive set.
> The naturals defined by Cantor have more elements than any natural
> number can measure. Inductive sets never can leave the domain measured
> by natural numbers.
No contradiction there.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.