Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <fe16a31bc47457c310e545d61f7969f57a60b56f@i2pn2.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<fe16a31bc47457c310e545d61f7969f57a60b56f@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:55:08 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <fe16a31bc47457c310e545d61f7969f57a60b56f@i2pn2.org>
References: <va104l$376ed$4@dont-email.me>
	<cd375f68f97a737988bab8c1332b7802509ff6ea@i2pn2.org>
	<va13po$376ed$7@dont-email.me>
	<d42e5d30ea5f1c067283cb04d8a7293e2117188e@i2pn2.org>
	<va16bg$38gbh$1@dont-email.me> <va1r6b$3bau7$2@dont-email.me>
	<va2542$3cvgv$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:55:08 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3210197"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2644
Lines: 30

Am Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:18:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 8/20/2024 5:29 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 20.aug.2024 om 06:33 schreef olcott:
>>> On 8/19/2024 11:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 8/19/24 11:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 8/19/2024 10:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/19/24 10:47 PM, olcott wrote:

>>>> But HHHn isn't given DDD∞ as its input, so that doesn't matter.
>>> All of the DDD have identical bytes it is only the HHH that varies.
>>> HHHn(DDD) predicts the behavior of HHH∞(DDD).
>> Not all HHH can be at the same memory at the same time.
> Counter factual. HHH∞ is hypothetical thus takes no memory.
> HHH and DDD remains at the same physical machine address locations.
HHH_oo can be implemented.

>> When HHHn is in the memory, then DDD calls HHHn, not HHH∞.
>> When HHHn is doing the simulation, HHHn is in that memory, therefore,
>> it should simulate HHHn, not HHH∞.
>> They cannot be at the same memory location at the same time, unless you
>> are cheating with the Root variable to switch between HHHn and HHH∞,
>> which causes HHHn to process the non-input HHH∞ instead of the input
>> HHHn.
> HHH∞ is hypothetical thus takes no memory. HHHn(DDD) predicts the
> behavior of a hypothetical HHH∞(DDD) as described below
HHHn should simulate itself, and HHH_oo should also be simulated by 
itself.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.