Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: The Apollo moon landings
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 10:25:29 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <fe715faf5669c2518100e0fadfa70c22@www.novabbs.com>
References: <a16b2511c2fa4b644b5a5e19b1a6eb3c@www.novabbs.org> <e0sehl-9nif.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <7dc7938d9b3ffb3a32296f91500919f5@www.novabbs.org> <qoefhl-n19g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <3a795d50693d32803192afbfa0ba3d91@www.novabbs.org> <7eighl-5rrh.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <1024bfi$3tu9k$1@dont-email.me> <2b491008a5fda623023d747ba70ffb7f@www.novabbs.com> <6434ec1576769c686742c4ed2fe52a48@www.novabbs.com> <mb7cs3Fphl9U5@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3461998"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$mJ.K7gcvJSijbuIJEcdz4enE.eqRz7m.I2wJivhMxs0jau7SreQWO

On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 8:02:19 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

> Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 06:17 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>>
>>> Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins,
>>> where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the
>>> guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2
>>> hours,
>>>
>>> By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon,
>>> isn't it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969)
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
>> The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of
>> professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and
>> "pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing
>> critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on
>> relativity!
>
> The 'usual skeptic' would look at the 'body language' of these heros.
>
> They didn't look very pleased, for instance, while being honored by
> standing ovations.
>
> Those were, apparently, 'orchestrated' by these guys sitting in the
> middle of the audience.
>
> But some sort of positive emotions would be a natural reaction to that
> kind of applause.
>
> But that didn't happen. Instead of smiling and grinning, the astronauts
> bowed their heads down, what is not the usual sign for good feelings.

Cruel to make competent people tell lies for their whole lives.

Woof woof such dishonesty is possible only for the naturally sinful ape.
>
>
> TH

--