Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:42:47 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <fe91bf0a87913037231b59594bde11e4@www.novabbs.com>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <17e2ff3657424607$138252$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <8c5cae32d7b5302644e335db90064dec@www.novabbs.com> <17e31d9f0ea34274$12530$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <e0281ec04148bf85dfc7103c807d52c4@www.novabbs.com> <17ea6b2dc47c9dec$254539$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <921cee453f06f441f282c56122f8d2e9@www.novabbs.com> <17eab009eee746e7$255287$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <6ec22f20b2a177162a95f6456c430b21@www.novabbs.com> <17eab5fcab72b695$178520$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <f3602324d5cd9eb34b9f3e9aca92a7ca@www.novabbs.com> <17eabed887c83827$276277$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <9f6af7656d5b519c8b95ab67f993a029@www.novabbs.com> <p6idnc24ocodvST7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <7nydnbqfqtEcvCT7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <v9b859$2qlfn$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2271556"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Fp4rrx4SC.cFblXwnKh4Renjv8dNgi1061/PKfB.Hqdza9rDmN7qe
Bytes: 2741
Lines: 27

On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:49:45 +0000, Python wrote:
>
> Le 11/08/2024 à 22:39, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> >
>> On 08/11/2024 01:35 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > >
> > > ....
> > > This isn't so different, yet, with a fuller dialectical
> > > account of a deconstructive account and real continuum mechanics,
> > > makes a better theory that isn't just broken by all the
> > > missing impetus of supposed luminous matter and energy
> > > in the entire cosmological survey, as that's thoroughly broken,
> > > according to conscientious science.
> > >
> > > Allais effect, ....
> >
> > Cf. "Modern Tests of Relativistic Gravitational Theories"
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=Pound%20Rebka%20%22rubidium%22
>
> Your post makes absolutely no sense from start to finish...
>
> You are a bot, right?

Perhaps not.  A friend of mine told about a person where he worked
who spouted technical words, each of which sounded like he knew
what he was talking about, but when put together ... made absolutely
no sense.