| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<ffad851d0e1e9c9a4d0d8d1b07c72965@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The first postulate is a truism. Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:32:06 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <ffad851d0e1e9c9a4d0d8d1b07c72965@www.novabbs.com> References: <cb971eee2e20fc0f69a1dadc4d899edd@www.novabbs.com> <10338b9$m1ka$1@dont-email.me> <1rebyzy.1pjth4x1bl89p4N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1707811"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$64aV7ZONZnYSbzVHk.gp2.VdAn1EcnNYgNHPHH2NOCIhfMecDJn1K X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 11:25:52 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 2025-06-19 17:37:29 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said: >> >>> Perplexity: >>> >>> "The First Postulate of Special Relativity >>> >>> Statement of the First Postulate >>> >>> The first postulate of special relativity, also known as the principle >>> of relativity, states: >>> >>> The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of >>> reference." >>> >>> >>> "truism >>> /?tr?iz?m/ n. a statement that is obviously true and says nothing new >>> or interesting. —truistic/tr?istik/ adj." -Oxford American. >> >> The first postulate is not a truism. It is possible to imagine a world >> where it is not true and to believe that we actually live in a such >> world. > > Applying 'truism' to postulate is a category error anyway, > (but what do we expect from dear Laurence?) > > Jan Speaking of category errors, why didn't Einstein make his first postulate: "The laws of electromagnetism are the same in all frames of reference." OR "The equations of electromagnetism must be adjusted for multiple frames of reference." OR "Without an aether we can use the Galilean transformations for light."