Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 13:16:37 +0000
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 06:16:37 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The taxonomy of Sahelanthropus tchadensis from a craniometric
 perspective
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo,sci.bio.paleontology
References: <v878po$bltf$1@dont-email.me> <gpOpO.141912$VQia.104675@fx13.ams1>
 <v8maae$3l5tm$3@dont-email.me> <A6HrO.27424$iAEf.14919@fx10.ams1>
 <v8no13$6f3$1@sunce.iskon.hr> <z8KrO.58999$XOje.6699@fx13.ams1>
 <v8odj7$md8$1@sunce.iskon.hr> <v8oe30$msh$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
 <v8olav$70p1$4@dont-email.me> <v8p9tc$a7s$3@sunce.iskon.hr>
 <v8pcjk$c1u$1@sunce.iskon.hr> <v8pf57$f531$5@dont-email.me>
 <FtednX8cDcl7xS37nZ2dnZfqlJwAAAAA@giganews.com> <v8pnj0$gqs1$2@dont-email.me>
 <YgadnfBrtKNsSi37nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v8svjn$1i607$1@dont-email.me>
From: John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <v8svjn$1i607$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <fg-dnWY_v4Sovy_7nZ2dnZfqlJ8AAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 21
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-ioq0LiL7V3Tdl9B0KqIwOlHl9uwC0KUK9ApYNcbpHMIQ8/BDOW9pmP7sxoTpGM3/rnfifOkFn85tGls!aFMzCacbEBjQDEafTtsT2TNXZbPsKrDjc/30gx68sfq6MAObApstA3Bu/gh3Lo6AgbYppGm1xB8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2405

On 8/6/24 3:57 AM, JTEM wrote:
>   John Harshman wrote:
> 
>> No, that was Chris Ho-Stuart
> 
> Look at the thread, you cowardly twat. You were arguing AGAINST
> me and I was pointing out that the so called evidence "against"
> interbreeding was consistent with interbreeding, as per the
> mainstream.

Nevertheless, it was Chris Ho-Stuart you were responding to in the post 
you just quoted. And I see that now, rather than reply to me, you are 
just snipping everything and launching into a stream of insults. So much 
for argument.

> It was all just fuckheads, like you, changing the rules from
> one sentence to the next. Which is a lot of things but it's
> never "Science."