Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<fj05Ngld3XDSXUprjPuMp0ivoP4@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <fj05Ngld3XDSXUprjPuMp0ivoP4@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <9e55d347a16ad439d5b2e75440ae1a6d@www.novabbs.com>
 <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com>
 <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <UjtKffdj34rh4B-JrKumzbeGtnc@jntp> <Z5JtI3c-5JMvtNLf7dMsy-PULgc@jntp>
 <qLtiG5g8NZm1g-FnNGAZjmL-3pA@jntp> <PFhIpzW_CY6k7-NpFFWxQ6U3-eM@jntp> <GWVnRHejRmzcWpGcF8X1yi0s9Ok@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: eVWgS3icb42N-3tlCPDG3RgOEAc
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=fj05Ngld3XDSXUprjPuMp0ivoP4@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 25 20:04:40 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="7a1acdfaa03ceae2fcc39113260f3e5d01945461"; logging-data="2025-01-13T20:04:40Z/9173801"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 2600
Lines: 28

Le 13/01/2025 à 20:55, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
> Le 13/01/2025 à 20:31, Python a écrit :
> 
>> You are a fraud.
> 
> I can't be an imposter since my entire theory of relativity is a personal and 
> coherent creation that holds together as a single block.

It is definitely personal. But it is, nevertheless, a bunch of nonsense 
and contradictions as it has been showed numerous time.

> Secondly, let's say I copied from someone: I copied from WHOM?

I didn't pretend that you copied it. It may be original and wrong. None of 
your fellow cranks has followed you. It is likely that you on the top 5 of 
stupidity, even amongst cranks.

> You promised to tackle my pdf as soon as it's finished.

It has already been done for almost all of your claims...

https://gitlab.com/python_431/cranks-and-physics/-/tree/main/Hachel?ref_type=heads

And a bunch of Usenet posts, for your more recent claims on accelerated 
travelers.