Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<fjs8vi9nb6d2trml31bpqg3a7n16rv4hqp@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:11:32 +0000 From: John Larkin <jl@997PotHill.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Shielding spacecraft against cosmic radiation Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:10:02 -0700 Organization: Highland Tech Reply-To: xx@yy.com Message-ID: <fjs8vi9nb6d2trml31bpqg3a7n16rv4hqp@4ax.com> References: <usosc0$18otd$1@solani.org> <34h1vihp32geb2olkcscfksbr8k0bdgdmu@4ax.com> <usrjfr$19rlq$1@solani.org> <ae13viptr1sskaqq1h2ru1j9i85sdecfrd@4ax.com> <usu4in$1bf46$1@solani.org> <in46vipa7a3eb6q7au6alobve5vfmv5jso@4ax.com> <usv9kg$1bn8q$1@solani.org> <s3d6vi95gfrbs6omoula55soaktalpggru@4ax.com> <ut0tb7$1cfla$1@solani.org> <eb58vidh7uivropd4lb3tjbf5iam87cid2@4ax.com> <ut18na$1d0b5$1@solani.org> <lun8vido07cnl5t4n7t7gl08e3sbinqpr3@4ax.com> <ut1qsr$1da25$1@solani.org> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 162 X-Trace: sv3-ChmrAzbmoQBrdEwoQs1dhSwtGVxVfs3hGy0JHcWbeWd+bMyRE0qEuaeks70/27hgiU6earHFg7BgSpD!LA3ZXF0qVMHrNfLGPxsa42xdhauMhWrec43pye+NafeXOLf+P9HpD3B5yXCFp5bufRO6k7jVrStl!xCMyGw== X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 8718 On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:52:57 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote: >On a sunny day (Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:04:17 -0700) it happened John Larkin ><jl@997PotHill.com> wrote in <lun8vido07cnl5t4n7t7gl08e3sbinqpr3@4ax.com>: > >>On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:42:50 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>On a sunny day (Fri, 15 Mar 2024 02:35:27 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>><jl@997PotHill.com> wrote in <eb58vidh7uivropd4lb3tjbf5iam87cid2@4ax.com>: >>> >>>>On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:28:39 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On a sunny day (Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:38:47 -0700) it happened john larkin >>>>><jl@650pot.com> wrote in <s3d6vi95gfrbs6omoula55soaktalpggru@4ax.com>: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:46:07 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On a sunny day (Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:13:31 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>>>>>><jl@997PotHill.com> wrote in <in46vipa7a3eb6q7au6alobve5vfmv5jso@4ax.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 06:13:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On a sunny day (Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:54:24 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>>>>>>>><jl@997PotHill.com> wrote in <ae13viptr1sskaqq1h2ru1j9i85sdecfrd@4ax.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:09:47 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On a sunny day (Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:18:18 -0700) it happened john larkin >>>>>>>>>>><jl@650pot.com> wrote in <34h1vihp32geb2olkcscfksbr8k0bdgdmu@4ax.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 06:22:55 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Shields up: New ideas might make active shielding viable >>>>>>>>>>>>>Active shielding was first proposed in the '60s. We’re finally close to making it work. >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/03/shields-up-new-ideas-might-make-active-shielding-viable/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>bit of static oelectricity, 1 MV ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>That's all absurd, cramming a crew into a tiny dark cylinder, deep >>>>>>>>>>>>inside tons of magnets, to reduce their radiation exposure a little. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Yes that may be more dangerus, tha tI why I like the elctrostatic solution. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Space is not people-friendly. Earth is. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Traveling to or living on Mars woud be lethal. Living on the moon >>>>>>>>>>>>would be bad too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Maybe we could convert some comet, live inside it, >>>>>>>>>>>use its material for power water and shelter >>>>>>>>>>>and put an engine on it and start interstellar travel: >>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%BBOumuamua >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You go first. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Oh I would not mind flying the comet thing, would want to have a say in the design and food chosen though. >>>>>>>>>but it will take generations to reach any target destination. >>>>>>>>>So you have to bring whole families , >>>>>>>>>or as things go now, just some skin and have a computah hatch you >>>>>>>>>and teach you when growing up near the destination. >>>>>>>>>Makes you wonder if the first life on earth was brought here in a similar way >>>>>>>>>(circular reasoning). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Earth is too good to be an accident, and our life form is too complex >>>>>>>>to have evolved from inorganics. Other civiizations in the universe >>>>>>>>have probably advanced for billions of years. So it's likely that >>>>>>>>Earth and DNA-based life were designed, maybe as a high school science >>>>>>>>project. I give it a B-. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Well I won't attack your religious beliefs >>>>>> >>>>>>I expressed no religious beliefs, and it's good that you wouldn't >>>>>>attack any. >>>>>> >>>>>>RNA World is a religious belief. Concensus and faith without evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Just watched some news story where a sort of computer robot was teaching kids... >>>>>>>Again, an other science program today on TV about planets: all sort of basic chemistry was found >>>>>>>on some moons and asteroids. >>>>>> >>>>>>Sure. Chemicals are not life, as a junk box full of parts is not a >>>>>>working electronic instrument. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>They did a testing in the lab and made RNA from just basic chemicals added some heat cycling and dry soak cycle >>>>>>>like you will find on planets (sun, tides): >>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2022-03-insight-life.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>>we are just a chemical reaction really. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>We are an astoundingly complex structure that uses chemicals and >>>>>>quantum mechanics. At least I am. >>>>> >>>>>from elementary particles to atoms to molecules to self-replicating RNA (check) >>>>>from RNA to DNA and ever more complex forms like us (check) >>>>>Readup on Darwin >>>>>:-) >>>> >>>>Read up on the ways our cells operate and reproduce. It's astounding. >>>> >>>>Darwin was very smart, but he had no idea how cells work. I think that >>>>if he had, he'd have been skeptical of random evolution and selection >>>>as our origin. >>> >>>Did you actually READ the >>> https://phys.org/news/2022-03-insight-life.html >>>link? >>>It is all very simple. >> >>Too simple. It's not DNA, not cells, it's unlikely to continue >>replicating outside the lab, and, being a lab experiment, is >>"intelligent design." Well, moderately intelligent. >> >>Lots of chemical reactions can be forced to replicate in the lab. >> >>>Life is everywhere buzzing >>>just like electrons around atoms >>> >>>The religious leaders have various routines to keep their power and palaces, >>>suck your money and wash you brain and force you into obedience >>>Take a step back. >>>The rain-dances ended when rain-radar was more accurate >>>Our lifeform has evolved something called 'ego' to protect ourself. >>>We are not that more complex than that sunshade with photo sensor that has a voice added >>>so when the sun shines it says 'sun', I am closing, and if no sun, I am opening. >>>That, in short, is all consciousness is. >>>Never the less we are all connected, these days via radio and teefee too. >>>Drop the mystics >>> >>> >> >>Blind faith hand-waving about random mutation and selection is mystic. >>Conjecturing about an actual, unlikely but plausible, origin of life >>is not. >> >>One big problem with accounting for DNA life is that an entire class >>of possible mechanisms is sneered at because considering them invokes >>the fear of drifting even slightly towards religion, and we can't >>allow that. You do that, mocking anything that you think might drift >>in that direction. Dawkins said that he was a capital-A Atheist first, >>and everything else flowed from that. >> >>He was capital-B Boring too, as compulsive believers tend to be. > >Well no use educting the brain washed. >Best of luck special heap of cells. >It is not bad that 'I' do not know what you babble about., much worse is that 'you' do not know. As one rich and famous person said, "Don't be a jerk. Nobody likes jerks."