Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <fyLcmxRQ7IFokA-xggYiYIaufuw@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a6036c3d29170$90809$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <K1sjSIRidGRyhD2K8Ndavvy6DFs@jntp> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp> <181a8ab40daa2f3b$84542$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <8kbiEMBjBP64SDxCqmK9hPf8iW8@jntp> <181a97a8cae7837c$86741$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <NJuSuqDy0JPTakkJauWYlZVmOr8@jntp> <181a997dca85fca1$84543$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: 8L9Dy9rfUD0xMTbhJs0E0txW1hM
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=fyLcmxRQ7IFokA-xggYiYIaufuw@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 25 15:49:09 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="cdcf91e3472b50c760e8dcbe4a2750ed9830a543"; logging-data="2025-01-14T15:49:09Z/9174590"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 2417
Lines: 20

Le 14/01/2025 à 16:42, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
...
>> Again, how come you are incapable of convincing ANYONE neither here nor 
>> elsewhere that your rant is a proper proof of anything?
> 
> Again - a fanatic idiot can never be convinced
> that he is a fanatic idiot, no surprise in
> that.

All of Humanity but Maciej Wozniak are "fanatic idiots"? You need medical 
help, Maciej.

> And as for rants - they are all yours. I've
> pointed directly 2 denying themself predictions of
> the physics of your idiot guru, i.e. provided
> a proof of its inconsistency.

Again, your alleged "proofs" have been refuted with meaningful arguments. 
As most cranks you too stupid and too stubborn to admit it.