| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<g3v85k12dd54tjp82qku9pda2sh13n87n9@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: fast tires Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:31:35 -0700 Lines: 81 Message-ID: <g3v85k12dd54tjp82qku9pda2sh13n87n9@4ax.com> References: <102smlf$2koi8$2@dont-email.me> <87msa5gk1j.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> <102ulf8$35v0c$2@dont-email.me> <102ur8h$37k89$7@dont-email.me> <vjs55kplr3rnq692uhjujc97uljhgf7keo@4ax.com> <87msa3ioel.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> <rmm85ktggu0vob1ludf3l616sqkat5oo8q@4ax.com> <hkp85ktp9ldn2sior0s9sc9fakvs4ark1c@4ax.com> <tqq85kpl41p1odul79lgedn19gvndns1oh@4ax.com> <87cyaza356.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> <g1u85k9jpfei8ubd6n6vaujk6g1hl5fdl3@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net AA7itv2CLnSnGJAyVAl9HADd7QIvwsYpndN+3qKgQdxPTZkjTR Cancel-Lock: sha1:4pKFdvhQYM+ZK1ZeDLNEKFbPJcU= sha256:CzvK9CihmIPWB3Mqg1GkzJzoWvVPZMokVj6XyuPH3/A= User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:53:00 -0400, Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: >On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:27:01 -0400, Radey Shouman ><shouman@comcast.net> wrote: > >>Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> writes: >> >>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:48:26 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:46:09 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:20:34 -0400, Radey Shouman >>>>><shouman@comcast.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> writes: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 12:58:56 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>(...) >>>>>>>>IOW if you turn an object loose with only its weight acting on its mass, >>>>>>>>it accelerates downward at one "gee." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Count me unimpressed by Krygowski's cut and paste. >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm reasonably sure that was written extemporaneously. Any engineering >>>>>>professor should be able to do the same. Any practicing engineer will >>>>>>have gone through the same reasoning many times. >>>>> >>>>>I'm reasonably sure he copied out of a book. >>>> >>>>To impress you, must one now memorize all the proofs and calculations? >>>>That seems a bit excessive. Do you memorize everything? I don't, >>>>mostly because my memory is not as good as when I was young. >>>>Secondarily, because I don't like distributing potentially wrong >>>>proofs and calculations. If you have memorized everything, I too >>>>would be very impressed. >>> >>> I don't learn things by rote, I learn by knowing how things work. >> >>If only you knew how force, mass, and acceleration worked you could >>also write out an explanation similar to that of Prof. Krygowski. > > >And I'd probably get it wrong. I'd say, "Who cares?" I care. I don't like half baked explanations. The problem is all such explanations are half baked because they don't take into consideration forces, masses and accelerations that only are important in unique situations. Newtonian mechanics worked quite well, until scientists discovered relativistic and quantum effects. It's really hard to claim something is right or wrong when all the calculations result in probabilities instead of fixed numbers. >Krygowski would >have to very sure he got all the commas and brackets exactly right. Why? Nobody else does that. Most people do their best and hope they got it right. Very few people provide rigorous proofs and copious citations that agree with their conclusions. I do my best to provide URL's from sources that either agree with my assertions or offer more detail on a topic that might help someone understand the topic. If people only posted things that they knew and could prove were absolutely correct, we would have nothing posted in rec.bicycles.tech. I've certainly produced my share of wrong information, incorrect analysis, bad conclusions and arithmetic errors. I do not consider these to be problems if I correct my mistakes (and apologize to the group). They are problems if the author goes into defensive mode and performs damage control using contrived facts and data. At this point, the usual solution is to ask an expert. However, that doesn't work very well: <https://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/crud/Premature-Judgement.txt> -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272 Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558