Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 01:31:26 +0000
From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: More Nails in the Global Warming Scam's Coffin
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 18:31:25 -0700
Organization: highland technology
Message-ID: <g40vvidgbghvubgekljmqofs9ruou6l3c3@4ax.com>
References: <mh3svidvdm11rfcb87qm5l2bgssffpt7pq@4ax.com> <ln4uvihvhcftscn5gf7vmijnqhm3rt7rgs@4ax.com> <1qqw3sg.1xt0x6u1pf4tigN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <7thuvidj3d6df9uurcg5k02hvdf3q8im7n@4ax.com> <65ff5116$0$4189$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <utnno6$3tpc8$1@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
X-Trace: sv3-7fa79P1XS6JvnWcC4Z7aNN1VPzL0KB2nMuDUadr7z685kI8GC3+rXv9cE4zxAZTbHT9F1IWtNZ6V1bR!riyQy6I+4UwEDaA3bPyRwrisyhpwDGZeqTC99sz2hZ0wjvSsAnc284MntXutwumEAh96S29y3TTt!tubMYA==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3059

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:14:12 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

>On 3/23/2024 3:00 PM, bitrex wrote:
>> Meanwhile, cranky wingnut "I don't believe in dat climate change stuff!" owners 
>> of beachfront property (naturally!) want the state/taxpayer to pitch in to save 
>> their property from the rising sea:
>> 
>> <https://www.instagram.com/krazykarens2020/reel/C4mb8m3LLO8/>
>> 
>> I expect they're going to take a heart-warming bath, alright. "Them dirty poors 
>> are stealing our hard-earned money! Taxation is theft by the state! Ack here 
>> comes the sea, come save us mommy state! Glub, glub, glub..."
>
>I suspect even the farmers in the flyover states are starting to realize
>that their primary asset (acreage) can't be relocated if the local climate
>makes it "unproductive" ("Hey!  Let's put up a WINDFARM!!")

https://extension.entm.purdue.edu/newsletters/pestandcrop/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/04/fig1.jpeg

This pattern extends over many crops and many countries.

>
>[Latest surveys continue to show increasing (US) belief in climate change...
>the differences seem to be who/how to deal with it:  "MY assets should be
>protected but why should *I* have to bear that cost?"]
>
>Disney will be the Florida property to watch.  Far enough from the coast to
>not be immediately threatened (and, able -- at some expense -- to move
>their "attractions" elsewhere) yet likely keenly aware that the long
>term play doesn't seem to be to remain in place...

Disney World is about 160 feet above sea level. At the current sea
level rise, it will get wet in about 20,000 years. But of course,
we'll have another ice age well before that, and sea level will drop.