Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<g4ct9jt13icqqcq6k9j78658mettnlb0if@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Strobl <news5@mystrobl.de> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: A Bicycle Safety Parable Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:35:23 +0200 Organization: @home Lines: 58 Message-ID: <g4ct9jt13icqqcq6k9j78658mettnlb0if@4ax.com> References: <v7gued$3l74a$1@dont-email.me> <v7gv2l$3l9bf$1@dont-email.me> <ll4o9jtbjqdm4snr1tlmsgaqd0s1sjtvas@4ax.com> <14dp9j1ha1s64g58tn1k5f4dep50ogilat@4ax.com> <1vgp9j9ln9pqrijflipvho4bm186qhdt56@4ax.com> <49sr9j51hfbh92t298aileki7sj10mo33o@4ax.com> <it7s9jdti64mvuuhqejmngi848meih94ca@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net DNa/vgju83g3wh9Gu3XR5gth+zJyvENgkp5z29+71P/WLk5e2f X-Orig-Path: mystrobl.de!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:PhIHxmoewXGgpioDYws821dGos8= sha256:41N3YKwOMptfX6xpCdob98j6TMtebZVrhR6gBeNfr1A= User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Bytes: 2965 Am Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:06:43 -0400 schrieb Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>: >On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:52:38 +0200, Wolfgang Strobl ><news5@mystrobl.de> wrote: > >>Am Sun, 21 Jul 2024 04:19:23 -0400 schrieb Catrike Ryder >><Soloman@old.bikers.org>: >> >>>On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:11:58 +0200, Wolfgang Strobl >>><news5@mystrobl.de> wrote: >>> >>>>Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:46:53 -0400 schrieb Catrike Ryder >>>><Soloman@old.bikers.org>: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 13:19:02 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 7/20/2024 1:08 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>>>> https://bicycledriving.com/law/a-bicycle-safety-parable >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>+1 >>>>>>I fought those fights against The Planners all my life. And >>>>>>lost every time. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>For what it's worth. I am opposed to any "bikeway" that is not >>>>>totally isolated from vehicular traffic and parked cars (bike lanes). >>>> >>>>That is completely missing the point. >>> >>>I thought one of the points was about disliking bike lanes. >> >>The general point was, bikes _are_ vehicular traffic and should operate >>by the rules for vehicular traffic. No need for bike lanes or other >>types of isolation. > >What made the guy in that article, or you, for that matter, qualified >to decide what other people should do. What qualifies _you_ to prohibit other people from driving a vehicle on the road, just because that vehicle isn't powered by an internal combustion engine or an electric motor? > >>Did you really read the text linked above? I very much doubt it. > >Oh, I did read the fear mongering text, ... O RLY? You obviously haven't read it. If anything, it is a satirical tirade against people who spread fear, written in the form of a parable. But perhaps it is a comprehension problem. -- Thank you for observing all safety precautions